Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

How Much Do The Blues Suck?

Bad sign when Walker gets pushed around.

By Brad Lee

After a 2-0 shutout loss at home Saturday night, the Blues are now winless in six straight games. In those six games (one was an overtime loss) they've scored four freaking goals. The team's last win was that thrilling, physical, emotional win over Chicago on Feb. 19. They have one more game at home before launching on a grueling nine-game road trip.

Only five teams have fewer points than the Blues in the entire NHL. Here's what's really sad: St. Louis is eight points out of the playoffs...but 10 points out of having the fewest points. What the hell happened?

Between writing for the paper and blogging on here, I'm out of words to describe what the Blues are doing right now. In an effort to accurately portray how much the Blues suck we offer:

The Top 11 Visual Representations Of The Blues' Season

11.

Good thing we don't have stock in the Blues.

10.

It's over, baby. Tap the keg.

9.

How do you spell failure? C-U-B-S.

8.

A Blues game, almost as painful to watch as Titanic.

7.

Premature victory speech = selling playoff packs last month

6.

Blues slipping away fast like someone else...

5.

No whammies, no whammies, stop!

4.

The Blues look a little lost right now.

3.

Blues have been knocked the fuck out of the playoffs.

2.

Blues' grade is either an F or check minus.

1.

Blues' season is crashing and burning.

We're that optimistic. We're just glad they don't play at home for a couple weeks after Tuesday.

Star-divide

Comment 31 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

if my brutally fast 10 seconds of math is right, unless we are over .500 we will not make last years ugly record.

by Childhood Trauma on Mar 2, 2008 4:15 PM CST reply actions  

childhood and anybody else there that hasn’t read the stats correctly b/c the stats make a misguided attempt

1)LAST YEAR WE WERE MORE THAN A GAME UNDER .500
2) THIS YEAR WE ARE WAY UNDER .500
3)IT GOES WINS—-LOSSES IN REGULATION—-LOSSES IN OVERIMTE OR SHOOTOUT BUT THEY ARE STILL LOSSES!!!!
4)OVERTIME AND SHOOTOUT LOSSES ARE STILL LOSSES!!!
5)OVERTIME AND SHOOTOUT LOSSES ARE STILL LOSSES!!!
6)…
7)…
8) so in other words with the games remaining we’d have to pretty much win every game to be above .500

9) KEEP ON LOSING SO WE CAN GET STEVE STAMKOS
10) I’D LOVE TO SEE MURRAY NEXT YEAR TRY AND NOT PLAY BERGLUND, STAMKOS, OR OSHIE OR PERRON

by chris d. on Mar 3, 2008 5:09 AM CST reply actions  

Chris: If anyone can do it, it’s The Goblin!

by Marcus Pettersson on Mar 3, 2008 6:15 AM CST reply actions  

chris d. just practically dared coach murray.

now he HAS to do it.

by Adam Duke on Mar 3, 2008 9:52 AM CST reply actions  

umm last year 81 points, 1/2 game below .500. (2 points per game, .500 would be 82 points)

this year 66 point in 65 games, 17 games to go

81-66= 15 points

15 points needed out of 17 games, so actually we can go a game under .500 and tie last year. 7-8-1 = tied with last year!

by Childhood Trauma on Mar 3, 2008 10:19 AM CST reply actions  

I believe this is another great representation of this season. I believe the person pictured is Bryce Salvador. Lucky bastard!!!

http://foulkes.cx/photos/Other20people’s20photos/paris20mig20crash.jpg

by Chris on Mar 3, 2008 10:44 AM CST reply actions  

For some reason the link above will not work, try again here…
http://foulkes.cx/photos/Other20people’s20photos/paris20mig20crash.jpg

by Chris on Mar 3, 2008 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

It’s worse than when the ice dancers like Janney and Turgeon played here:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v285/capecodtradingcompany/Blog/2007-10-31_b5.jpg

by Pagan on Mar 3, 2008 1:57 PM CST reply actions  

http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/images/happygilmore2.jpg

You little son of a bitch puck! Why you don’t you just go home? That’s your HOME! Are you too good for your home? ANSWER ME! SUCK MY WHITE ASS PUCK!

by Pagan on Mar 3, 2008 2:02 PM CST reply actions  

Can’t possibly suck as much as this band must!

http://www.omodern.com/kult/images/torlenners.jpg

by Marcus Pettersson on Mar 3, 2008 2:34 PM CST reply actions  

Marcus, they look like a prison roadside crew that happened to find a guitar.

Classy!

by Rich Horton on Mar 3, 2008 2:40 PM CST reply actions  

Has anyone noticed that the Blues Calendar handed out at the season opener had Doug Weight last month and Bryce Salvador this month? Those two players have sold their souls to the devil in order to jinx the Blues so they would never score again. It is almost working since we have scored 4 goals in the last 6 games. Doesn’t seem to far fetched with the ridiculous amount of scoring chances we have had and how we can’t get a bounce to go our way.

We need to sacrifice a chicken, does anyone have a chicken they don’t mind donating to the Blues?

by Chris on Mar 3, 2008 4:40 PM CST reply actions  

We can’t just go around sacrificing chickens in the dressing room. How aboot a bucket of KFC?

by Brad Lee on Mar 3, 2008 5:20 PM CST reply actions  

well its official kevin slaten in the rant just pronounced the blues have given up on the season, on andy murray, and on offense.

by Childhood Trauma on Mar 3, 2008 5:51 PM CST reply actions  

Trauma, there’s your first mistake: listening to the queen Kevin Slaten.

by Brad Lee on Mar 3, 2008 7:13 PM CST reply actions  

Bad finish = good draft pick, and you know how your GT Prospect Department feels about good draft picks…

I doubt the Blues will get Stamkos, however… think Kyle Beach or Zach Bogosian.

And you guys may think OT losses and SO losses are still losses… but as long as the Blues get a point for them, as far as I’m concerned, they’re ties.

What the hell was wrong with a good, old-fashioned tie anyway?

Thanks, Gary.

B.

by GT Prospect Department on Mar 3, 2008 7:24 PM CST reply actions  

What’s the difference between a cactus and Wrigley Field?

With a cactus, all the pricks are on the outside…

Cubs Suck,

B.

by GT Prospect Department on Mar 3, 2008 7:25 PM CST reply actions  

not necessarily the listing to the queen. i’ve not been the words greatest murray fan. now sportcaters are activily telling this city players have “quit on andy murray” which i haven’t even claimed. if that seed hold, there is no greater negative than to say it.

will be interesting to see if anything comes of this, obviously the blues aren’t run or even concerned by slaton, but will the fans turn on murray?

by Childhood Trauma on Mar 3, 2008 10:17 PM CST reply actions  

Murray deserves 3 full seasons before the claws come out. If remarkable improvement (which, in my opinion, would mean a great deal than we’ve seen thus far) isn’t seen, then I think talking about change would be appropriate.

These are the current active players that I would estimate to be “Murray’s guys” by way of contract signings and acquisitions during his reign:

Kariya
Boyes
McDonald
Backes
Mayers
Perron
Stastny
Stempniak
Tkachuk

Brewer
Jackman
Johnson

…which, to me, leaves a full foward line, half of a defensive corps, and an overhauled goaltending system to go.

I love Manny, but I’m 50/50 on whether he’ll be around long enough to see this team go deep.

by Adam Duke on Mar 4, 2008 12:38 AM CST reply actions  

Agreed on Manny. That’s why it’s so important for us to have a good backup. Someone who’s actually able to step up when the time comes. I thought Ears could be that guy. Not that I’ve given up on him, yet, but man… has he ever sucked…

by Marcus Pettersson on Mar 4, 2008 1:19 AM CST reply actions  

Marcus: Ears is still young, and wet behind them. Some goalies don’t mature until their late 20’s, and by the time the Blues reach that decision point, they’ll know which of Bishop/Berra/Schwarz/Ears is a viable plan A.

Adam: We also have to take into account JD’s boys, which would be the farm system. I think they’ve pretty much cut the deadwood at the AHL level. My guess is that unless they are able to sign an impact forward, the full forward line is gonna be 2/3 kids, 1 reliable vet.

by The Goalie Guy on Mar 4, 2008 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

We’re the suckiest sucks that ever sucked.

by StLooFrenchy on Mar 4, 2008 3:35 PM CST reply actions  

My low expectations created an upper limit to my dismay, but losing still annoys me.
A bottom three finish is still possible and then we can sacrifice the chicken to clinch the draft lotto.

by brian on Mar 4, 2008 4:04 PM CST reply actions  

my comp shut down before i could respond.

a win is a win. a loss is a loss but it only sucks half as much when you go past regulation. gp and wins is what gives u a winning pct.

but when you are looking to see how good a team is check out how many more wins they have then losses. look at the standings it is pretty shocking but makes more sense than saying that this team was above .500 for the past few months.

dude get rid of murray and tkachoke. tkachoke has played for three blues’ coaches. one of them really sucked. another it’s hard to completely tell since he has only coached talent laden teams. and the current one well he’s got a pattern for sucking. 599 games coached. only 270 wins. which is a 45.07 winning pct.

let’s also talk about the fact none of his teams have advanced beyond the second round of the playoffs when they made them.

so the claws coming out, mine came out early november when i noticed a few things.

by Chris D. on Mar 4, 2008 7:02 PM CST reply actions  

82 points is not 0.500 hockey, because not all games are worth 2 points. Unfortunately, because of the screwy system the NHL has set up, some games are worth 3 points, but you don’t know how many until the end of the season. Since roughly half of the conference makes the playoffs, you can consider making the playoffs to be playing 0.500 hockey. Last year that took (IIRC) 95 points, 13 points over the supposed 0.500 mark. It will be about the same this year, give or take a point. The correct way to determine what 0.500 is to total up all the points earned by all the teams and divide by 60 (30 teams, then divide total points in half).

Or you could just say that 82 points is 0.500 and 0.500 is still a sucky team.

by baroose on Mar 4, 2008 8:14 PM CST reply actions  

As much as it pains me to admit, I think the Blues have a problem with leadership and team chemistry, that goes back at least into the coach Q era. Changing the coach is not going to get us there. How many players are left from that era? Tkachuk, Mayers, Jackman. Anyone else? I forget. Since everyone else is gone and the team still has a chemistry problem, one of those three must be the locker room cancer.

by baroose on Mar 4, 2008 8:17 PM CST reply actions  

well gt my scouting says it all depends on where the blues draft and who drafts before them. if they get the #1 overall it’s stamkos, a no doubter. no if they fall to say sixth or seventh then it gets dicey depending on who;s before them. one player i really like in this draft is colin wilson. the performance he had in worlds this year was amazing. he made van reimsdyk look even better. colin has a sweet, sweet set of hands and great speed. he has put up decent numbers at boston u. despite his very young age at the college level. he can play in all situations. he’s also got that aspect of being a winner. he has those intangibles and this is another reason i’m loving this kid. he’s got some of the best hands since patrick kane. i actually like his hands more than stamkos. stamkos just has a deadly nose for the net which the blues sorely lack.

while kyle beach has good size and skill he has a hard time in the dzone and often takes stupid penalties. this demeanor you will find causes him to go lower in the draft. the only thing that brings him right back up is his size and postion and the fact he puts up decent numbers in the western league a notoriously tough league to play in.

but there is yet one player i may covet over even the oft spoken of stamkos and that is…drum roll please….bogosian. close tie pietrangelo. but shhh…don’t say it too loud. i covet bogosian the most due to his extraordinary offesive skills for a defensemen. u too can see what i mean and check him out, as rick meagher might say, by looking him up on youtube.

gt every year i go through a list of undrafted players in the canadian major juniors that shocks me b/c they performed and produced but were passed up by the potential. sometimes i wonder, besides the really slow ones and sometimes even them, why more of them never see the light of day.

best case scenerio, some how the blues pull bogo and wilson out of this draft.

in other interesting news…how in the hell did the blues not pick up huet for a second rounder? we have extras this year. manny’s slated for knee surgery the kind where some people have trouble walking the rest of their life afterwards and he’s a goalie. hmmm…interesting. maybe then perron would feel stronger with another frenchman around? (note:huet was born in france).

by chris d. on Mar 5, 2008 6:17 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Why not the St. Louis Blues.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nickmason12_small
Today's Memorial Cup Update
Mattmeweb_small
Mike Danton to play in UK
Hattoriavatar_small
NAHL Stuff: Sweet Merciful Crap, it might be Realignment Time Again!
Hobbes_200_225_small
Kane photoshop
Nickmason12_small
Rattie, Winter Hawks Are Done...
Blues_small
Does anyone have a link to...?
Small
I guess I've been ignoring the East for a while.
Nickmason12_small
Saint John Sea Dogs win QMJHL President's Cup
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
2012/2013 St. Louis Blues - my take
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
St. Louis Blues 2012 Recap

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

HELP NEEDED
Brian Elliott joins You Can Play Project :)
Monday Night Miracle. 26 years ago today (May 12, 1986)
Monday Open Thread
This was how I was during game 3 of this past series. I was more composed by game 4.
Ryan Reaves to be included in Game 4
I was interviewed for school and here is the finished product... I am a DORK!
The Donut Corner - Giving Up Is For Losers
Monday Open Thread: No. 27 a "Gametime" Decision.
I propose this song as the theme song of the series

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who's the better tandem: Plante/Hall or Halak/Elliott?
Plante/Hall
61 votes
Halak/Elliott
95 votes
They're both awesome.
113 votes
How do you even compare these two?
114 votes

383 votes | Poll has closed


Bobby

Face_lo-res_copy_small gallagher

160gthockey_small Brad Lee

250px-nation_of_joe_small averagejoe

Barclay

Fulton_display_image_small Poor College Student

19659_686325605993_17221278_39458432_4223533_n_small bradflick55

Portman_small hartigan

Billy

Nickmason12_small Tomorrows Blues

Img_0645_small Donut King

Stag_logo_small CrossCheckRaise

549122314_small hildymac

Nate_the_great_small NateTheGreat.

Picbylindsey1_small RealBadRobot

Small socityhooligan

Keith3_small Andy Portico