Vancouver Signs Backes To Offer Sheet-UPDATED!

By Brad Lee
According to TSN, the Vancouver Canucks have signed restricted free agent David Backes to an offer sheet. The contract is a three-year deal worth $7.5 million. The Blues now have seven days to match the offer and take on that contract for Backes or allow him to move to Vancouver and receive a second round pick in next year's draft as compensation.
The Blues Web site indicates the offer has other details including a $1 million signing bonus in the contract and this quote from team president John Davidson:
"We will review the offer and base our decision on what is best for our organization," said Davidson.
Interesting. If the Blues thought the decision to match the offer was a slam dunk, wouldn't they have said they'll match the offer? Maybe Backes should start packing his bags.
Last season Backes had 13 goals and 31 points in 72 games, which was a letdown after he had scored 10 goals and 23 points in just 49 games the season before. He just turned 24 in May.
What's most notable about Backes is how seemed to transform his game late in the season. As the team limped to the finish line for the third season in a row out of the playoffs, Backes put on a nightly physical display. He wasn't intimidated by anyone. He played a hard-hitting game that was fun to watch. And he has shown flashes of being a 20-30 goal-scorer when he clicks with his linemates. And when he's physically able to see the puck...

This morning when thinking about the Blues not being active in free agency, Backes was definitely one of the players this team planned to build around. A cap hit of just over $2 million a year isn't great but not a deal breaker. Backes should probably remain in St. Louis.
What do you think?
UPDATE: The Blues wasted little time to announce they are matching the offer and will keep Backes. Here's the confusing quote from the Blues:
"Dave Checketts (Chairman and Principle Owner) was very supportive of this decision to sign David," said Davidson. "David is a major part of our youth movement in St. Louis and we expect him to play a huge role as we move forward."
Chris Gift said that reads like, "My name is Larry. This is my brother Darrell. This is my other brother, Darrell."
So the Blues now have a 13-goal scorer from a year ago making $2.5 million once you factor in the signing bonus. Probably not the most ideal situation. But this is a precedent-making decision.
The Blues will hopefully have a lot of young players with meaningful roles the next few years. It seems in the new NHL, guys are getting big money based on potential and when they're unrestricted free agents. What happens when Perron, E. Johnson, Oshie and Berglund come up in succession? Granted, it's a nice problem to have. But the Blues had to send a message quickly that they will fight to keep their players. And they also showed earlier this year by signing Boyes to a nice contract that they will do everything they can to get a guy signed to prevent this situation from happening.
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
to re-iterate, I called this, if the blues haven’t a plan (and backes may not be the only one, possibliy the only one the blues might match though)
FIRE SOMEONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
to misquote lewis black: how could the blues not know? I knew and i was sitting on my couch. But even i thought they would have a plan. how could they not have a plan? and how could the ddemocrats not demanded one?
by Childhood Trauma on Jul 1, 2008 3:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they were hoping he’d sign for more money and they’d get a first and a third.
I like him, but I don’t think they’re lost without him. I’d still match that offer sheet if I were JD and Co.
by Pagan on Jul 1, 2008 3:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Strickland says on the Rumor Monger’s site that if the Blues match the offer, they will have to shed payroll somewhere else. But Checketts in the Post story about the Blues being quiet in free agency said the payroll could go up and probably would. So it leads me to believe they kind of expected a deal like this and maybe even had a plan.
Maybe.
by Brad Lee on Jul 1, 2008 3:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Vancouver wants to pay that much for what is essentially a grinder, let them. Even Dave Lowry used to show “flashes” of scoring ability. With a big body and his fearlessness, Backes will probably a decent career as an NHL journeyman, but he’s not my idea of a building block. Just because he’s young doesn’t make him inherently valuable.
by LeNoceur on Jul 1, 2008 4:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would hope that he takes all 7 days to match just so gillis can’t use the 2nd rounder in other trades/offer sheets just to screw them over
by matt on Jul 1, 2008 4:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want to see Backes go. I really don’t. I think losing him would be a big loss.
(If he does go, please let there be a plan and let it all become clear soon, please!)
by Mr. Particle on Jul 1, 2008 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chicago gets Campbell. They just locked themselves up for 8 years, 57 mil.
Craziness.
by Marcus Pettersson on Jul 1, 2008 4:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blues match offer:
http://blues.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NewsPage&articleid=367429
Crisis averted.
by IrishBlue on Jul 1, 2008 5:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m comfortable with either outcome.
If I were deciding, I’d match.
by brian on Jul 1, 2008 5:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Post has been updated with Blues matching the offer sheet.
And fuck the Blackhawks for signing Campbell.
by Brad Lee on Jul 1, 2008 6:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Blackhawks MAJORLY overpaid for Campbell.
Show of hands, and be honest… who had ever heard of Brian friggin’ Campbell before this season?
That’s what I thought.
That contract will be a millstone around their necks before three years have passed.
B.
by Brian Weidler on Jul 1, 2008 6:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking that at some point today, an NHL team signed the next Bobby Holik and Martin Lapoint — the two contracts blamed as the dominoes to cause the last lockout.
by Brad Lee on Jul 1, 2008 7:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
::raises hand:: Brian Campbell has been fantasy hockey gold the last few years, especially when he was in Buffalo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8gbZyylCck
As long as we can manage the cap, pay’em. I’m glad we’re keeping Backes, even at that $$$.
by Tim on Jul 1, 2008 8:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ironically, TSN shows that Holik has just signed with the Devils … again.
by Tim on Jul 1, 2008 8:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
… and NJ has also signed Bryce Salvador to a 4-year deal.
and, I’ll shut up now.
by Tim on Jul 1, 2008 8:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
THe trick will be ID’ing the kids worth extending and doing it before their rookie deals expire.
by brian on Jul 1, 2008 11:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear Brian Campbell,
That deal made even me jealous.
Sincerely,
Alexei Yashin
by Gift on Jul 2, 2008 11:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear Chicago,
Have fun managing your cap over the next few years and tryign to keep Kane, Toews and Beach after handcuffing yourselves with the Campbell contract.
Sincerely,
The guys that locked up Fragile Jay McKee and Mr. Roboto
by Pagan on Jul 2, 2008 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dear chicago,
your over the cap, maybe, by almost 2 million, maybe. I respectfully suggest a Brent Seabrook for Matt Walker trade is in both our interests.
additionally, before ytou conter offer, please note, we have no interest in any of your 12.25 million dollar goalie cap guys. good luck with them.
P.S. what happened to you chicago you used to be so cheap, who died and left you in charge?
oh, nevermind…
by Childhood Trauma on Jul 2, 2008 1:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wirtz is spinnin’ like a chicken on a rotisserie.
/and probably cooking like one, too!
by Milo on Jul 2, 2008 9:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear Blues Management:
Is there still a team in St. Louis?
Signed,
All UFAs and RFAs
by Milo on Jul 2, 2008 9:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear UFA’s and RFA’s,
Yes, there’s still a team in St. Louis… but “team” is the key word, as in “an organization that’s built from within,” with players acquired and developed the old-fashioned way.
There’s little room for guys who had one good season, maybe two, and are looking to parlay that into the “set-me-up-for-life” contract (see Campbell, Brian).
If you’re a young guy looking to get in on the ground floor of an up-and-coming organization, and don’t have an agent who’s telling you that you’re the second coming of Mike Bossy or Bobby Orr and should be paid as if you’ve already accomplished what those gentlemen did, give us a call and we’ll see what kind of reasonable deal we can work out that makes sense for both of us.
Signed,
The St. Louis Blues
by Brian Weidler on Jul 3, 2008 11:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Brian Weidler Says: July 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am
Dear UFA’s and RFA’s, …
If you’re a young guy looking to get in on the ground floor of an up-and-coming organization, and don’t have an agent who’s telling you that you’re the second coming of Mike Bossy or Bobby Orr and should be paid as if you’ve already accomplished what those gentlemen did, give us a call and we’ll see what kind of reasonable deal we can work out that makes sense for both of us.
Amen, brother.
My post was of the variety that is hopeful that we are at least talking to some of the guys you describe. I am with the long-term rebuilding program and do not want to see the likes of Brian Noonan and the rest of the ’94 Ranger “gritty” guys reunited in STL again.
Are we seeking those reasonable guys you describe? Is there any such thing???
by Milo on Jul 3, 2008 2:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear Game Time Posters,
Stop copying my clones
Sincerely,
Jim Rome
P.S. Rack ’em
by Gift on Jul 3, 2008 5:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear Jim Rome:
We Game Time Posters know this isn’t you because you talk nothing but basketball throughout the winter and free agency. The NHL rates with you less than soccer. When you do have an NHL interview, it is forced and you kiss ass.
Sincerely,
Milo in STL
WAR: You suck!!!
by Milo on Jul 3, 2008 5:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
As opposed to the ones where he doesn’t kiss ass?
by Gift on Jul 3, 2008 5:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jim Rome is John Hadley on a diet. Both are about equal in terms of their being utter wastes of good oxygen.
Milo: I don’t know if the Blues are actively seeking any of the reasonably-priced players, or if there is any such animal. I guess we can all be grateful that hockey hasn’t sunk to the depths being plumbed by MLB, where career .250 hitters get long-term contracts for $20 million a year…
B.
by Brian Weidler on Jul 3, 2008 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Gift Says: July 3rd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
As opposed to the ones where he doesn’t kiss ass?
Good Point. I’m surprised he doesn’t ask to sniff their jock strap/cup.
Brian Weidler Says: July 3rd, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Jim Rome is John Hadley on a diet. Both are about equal in terms of their being utter wastes of good oxygen.
Hadley says, “Moo,” followed by a bunch of other unintelligible crapola.
Rome says, “Concur”, although “I agree” or “Me, too” would make him sound like less of an ass.
by Milo on Jul 4, 2008 12:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









![Backes design from your friends at 314 Threads [314threads.com]. De-troit Sucks.](http://cdn1.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/103150/4418130329_d70e4e8808_o_small.png)



















