Blues Wins Over Detroit, Just Two Games?
Don't say the two games are just two games.
The suddenly successful Sweden trip completed by the Blues over the weekend was just two games on the schedule. There are still 80 games left to play between now and April. There are still four more games against the Red Wings. Lot's of crap is still going to happen this season.
Yet these weren't just any two games. These games are a validation. They are a message. They are the next step. Sure, I could be full of crap, but before you pass judgment, let me explain.
The Red Wings have been the class of the Western Conference for awhile now. Too long, obviously. But you don't get to two straight Cup Finals without a little chutzpah. The Wings are obviously a veteran team filled with guys who "know how to win." They don't roll over for anybody. So giving two early leads to Detroit before forcing the action and dominating the games is no small shakes. It took a talented, fast and skilled team to pull off those two games.
The Blues didn't learn to play this brand of hockey overnight. This is a team cooked in a crock pot set on low. It's been built through multiple drafts, a few shrewd trades and a couple of free agent signings and waiver wire pickups. In other words, they picked their own guys they liked that others left on the table and they acquired players others found to be expendable or too expensive. And these two wins are another validation of the team's plan. Think about how long the Predators and Blue Jackets have been building this way. And it hasn't worked. It's not easy. Yet, here we are. The front office made some uncanny decisions on players, stuck to its guns and the team has a white hot start to the season as a reward.
It would have been super easy during Saturday's game to mail in two more periods after they were dominated in the first. They already had a win in the bank and Detroit had complete control. Sure Keith Tkachuk scored that power play goal late - fittingly with the puck just barely sliding behind Jimmy Howard in a rather unconvincing fashion. But they obviously didn't give up. They came out balls to the wall and kicked some ass to even the game, take control and finish the Wings off. Not only was it a big "Fuck You!" to Detroit, but a shot across the bow in the Central Division standings. No team wants to play the Blues right now, unless they're DirecTV subscribers and didn't see Friday's game.
After last season's frantic finish to snatch the sixth seed on the very last day of the season, they laid a big ass egg in the playoffs. It made outsiders question if the whole thing was a mirage. But we knew. We fans who watched this team come together, it was obvious to us. At that point, the team could go one of two ways. They either could have found satisfaction in what they accomplished and tried to forget how it ended. Or they could have gotten so pissed off in the summer that when the season opened, the team's motto could have been, "May God have mercy on the souls of our opponents - no matter their name, colors or crest."
So yeah, it's only two games. But come April, they could be seen as two of the most important games of the entire season. And think about how fucking awesome it's going to be when the Blues come out of the dressing room to a sold-out crowd at the Drinkscotch Center on Thursday night. When the ringing leaves your ears and you've found your voice after screaming it out, then tell me it's just two games.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
it is JUST 2 games
the biggest concern is this: how bad do the wings suck? no one knows, now if the wings are central division leaders again this year, those two games are VERY important. if the wings scuffle for a playoff spot, or fall out, those two games become two games against the cleveland coyotees. points is points, but there is no milestone in beating a dead horse. it reallty shouldnt matter if the dead horse was a plow puller or a preakness winner. dead is dead. are the wings class or ass this season?
the wings kept most of their vaulted “o” in place, but their d, and their net minding are questionable for 2010. both were exposed by the blues. but if every team exposes osgood and howard, it won’t be much of an accomplishment
and just what questions did the blues answer?
1: resiliancy. that is definately an important question to answer, and it made me proud to be a fan
2. power play will be ok. and by ok, i mean ok, yea we scored a lot, and kt did what he did early last season, but the pk? the shortie given up? the blues will score on the power play, but they need to make sure they win special team games by cleaning up some lapses at the pp blue line, pp line changes, and the pk.
3. AM got the team ready to start the season. he hasn’t always accomplished that. but i have to say, the blues were well schooled in what they wanted to do against the wings
4. hositle crowds don’t phase the blues. always a plus. although offically a home-and home series, we all know the blues were deep in enemy territory for this series, and it didn’t shake their confidence, neither did a few horrid calls, which in the past, would often destroy the blues momentum for 60 minutes. Tony calls it a “hard nine” i guess the Blues play a “hard 60”. they should. they did. if they continue that, talent will out and the arena will be rockin every single game. looking forward to THAT.
still have questions about youth and, to my mind, netminding. too early to answer. blues goalies outplayed the wings, but does that say ANYTHING? sydor was pretty shakey in his one area (and his one area is “don’t suck”). Scared me a few times doing some high school crap (getting stick caught in net, losing stick about 3 other times to phantom hockey ghosts, etc) hope the youngsters were not watching sydor to learn their skillz
what is with coming out ‘dead as a fish in the desert’ both games? THAT is something that shouldn’t happened twice in a row, assuming it should happen ONCE in a row. better not happen three times, or AM is going to explode all over some people (and i think it will be perron just cos andy’s familiar with doing that)
this team still has a place for “jeff” weaver. which means something. and that something isn’t good. not that weaver sucked, in fact he played better than sydor, but he is tiny and was purchased before last season as a mentor. a mentor tied to PEORIA. don’t forget, for virtually the same amount of extra money we could have just kept mckee and had him instead of weaver and/or sydor.
who is going to fight? i’ve no problem being kingless- being camless. but will we want winchester, backes, kt? jackman?? group drop effort, or not? if we fight by committee, every fight is going to put the blues at a talent disadvantage as they will send send a regular to sit for 5 minutes next tot he other teams goon.
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Oct 5, 2009 10:04 AM CDT reply actions
1 day urine, the next day urout
it isnt about urine, i think people are blowing smoke up detroit’s ass. i don’t think they are going to be the team to beat. While i understand the inertial that keeps the wings as the titular “team to beat”, if detroit, as i anticipate, have taken steps backwards, then measuring the distance between the blues and detroit doesn’t say anything about the blues’ own forward progress. after two games the question instantly becomes are the wings that bad or the blues that good? it is a question the swedish series posed, not answered. personally i’m more afraid of the hawks this season than the wings.
chicago had a better d last season, over 100 points, they have the better REGUALR season coach, better goalies, better pk. they have done nothing to indicate a fall in those areas this season
detroit won last year for two reasons.
1. goal scorers
2. puck possesion= limited opponet scoring chances==== they were second best in the league at shots allowed
detroit lets in 5 more shots a game they miss playoffs, detroit allows scoring chances from prime locations and they lose.. I think detroit is fully capable of a massive drop this season in positional team defense.
detroit deveolpes a goalie issue like the blues had for 3 months last season, and they in deep deep trouble. they can’t fix it, and their fans won’t support it. be very ugly. I’d hate for it to happen. really. (ok i’m lying, so what?)
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Oct 5, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Great post and great reply.
It is just 2 games, and any smart ass Red Wing fan out there (yes, there are a few) can point to the rafters of the “joe” and school us on Stanley Cup banners. This weekend was very refreshing, but it was just 2 games. It was utterly freaking fantastic. Did we exorcise any demons? No. My friends, we do that in the spring whenever we knock’em out of the playoffs.
Two words:
Fuck. Detroit.
That is all.
One day, David Backes and Albert Pujols will combine forces to become the most awesome piece of violent force known to man.
by Donut King on Oct 5, 2009 11:10 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
I second this response....
I still maintain Vladimir Konstantinov got what he deserved...If you can't handle that then kiss my ass......
by dablues7 on Oct 5, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
These two wins are
huger than Rosie O’Porkchop’s backside
More epic than a flying lip with Jennifer Connelly
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints
Last Year's Playoffs
I didn’t really think that the Blues laid an egg. If you swapped Luongo and Mason I think that the Blues would have swept the Canucks.
It’s a good start to the season and it’s kind of a big deal because it gets the team some momentum and self-belief. Does that count for much? Who knows but it can’t hurt.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Amen, Brother Puppets!
Let's go Blues!!!
by Milo. on Oct 5, 2009 1:41 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Well yeah
But they had Luongo and we had Mason and that isn’t changing—-the Blues’ skaters had to really outplay the Canucks skaters to win that series. Losing 4 straight is chicken squatting no matter how you go about it. Luckily we have more talent and experience at both ends of the ice.
Not afraid to nitpick
God damn it,
Why do Tuesday and Wednesday have to be in my way this week! I gave up 2 tickets in 114 to sit with my 307 family, and Thursday cannot come soon enough!!!
by k10patel on Oct 5, 2009 4:56 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
You did what?
I’ve thought about doing that before, but then I usually tell them “Hey, why don’t we meet at the pretzel stand during intermission?”
I’m nice, but not that nice.
Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
This is a team that has been built properly
Ever since the lockout and subsequent salary purge, St. Louis’ management has had an eye towards the future. And, the future is now arriving. John Davidson was a brilliant hire, Andy Murray is a great coach who can hopefully keep the players buying into his system and the experience/youth blend is near perfect. If the goaltending holds up, they can go a long way.
Detroit has goaltending issues...
But they’ve had the same issues for the past 2 years. They were able to cover it up with an incredible puck-moving defense, and their puck possession kept the true scoring chances against Osbad down. Lidstrom may still be smart, but he’s lost a step or two, and they are a little young on defense. There are a bunch of support guys they lost up front, and the gruesome twosome are also getting a bit long in the tooth. They may still know how to win, but aging cores can undermine a foundation.
I think that until they fall in the pisser completely (oh please let it be soon!) Fuck Detroit has to be considered the class of the Central. I’m with CT, though, if Huet is the answer in goal, then Chicago looks like the team to beat.
But this team isn’t far away. A good second-pair to go with EJ (was it me, or did Sydor look amazingly slow and uncoordinated last weekend?), an NHL-ready Petro instead of Weaver and a game-stealing goaltender, and you are looking at a serious, perennial Stanley Cup contender.
Oh, and does anybody else think that Columbus is overrated at the start of the season?

by 

























