Holy shit, here we go again. Puck CLEARLY in but no goal. The really sad part of this continuing debacle is the Leafs were coming back. The game ended up 3-2 and this goal would have tied it.
Video review in a wonderful thing but you also have to include someone doing the review that possesses a fucking working brain and who can read a fucking eye chart.
Conclusive can also mean if the goalie's glove is in the god dayum net with the puck in it it's a fucking goal, even if you can't conclusively see the dayum puck.
/rant
about 2 years ago
spectr17
8 comments
2 recs |
Comments
Umm.. Lets see...
Goalie Glove over the line.
Puck inside Goalie Glove
Puck isn’t in the goal?
Does not seem logical.
You can't call me a fair weather Blues fan.
Happened again last night too...
… in the Blackhawks game. Clearly over the line, in Huet’s glove… and called a no-goal. They need to clean off the monitors or get HD ones or something up in Toronto.
Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
obvious explanation
they didn’t want to provoke some serial killer rage.
"It’s a brand new day
And the sun is high
All the birds are singing
That you’re gonna die" ~ Dr. Horrible
Ooh, good point.
Sometimes it’s better to ignore the law and not have to deal with a nutbar than it is to enforce it and get goalie-sticked to death.
Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
heres another one
this one is even worse:
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2009/11/18/red-wings-get-robbed-on-what-might-be-worst-call-of-the-season/
If you have a donkey and i have a chicken and youre donkey ate my chickens feet what would you have.... 2 feet of my cock in youre ass!! haha

"/>


















