David Perron
What is it about David Perron that Andy Murray and John Davidson don't like? Does anybody have the answer to that?
He has been demoted to the Fourth Line. To me, that immediately means that this is one of the best Fourth Lines in Blues history, perhaps since Jimmy Roberts and Jean-Guy Talbot skated as forwards during the 1960s. If you doubt me, then you must tell me why you think that Perron's goal tonight was not perhaps one of the best of the season, and, in the over 40 years that I have been watching Blues hockey, one of the best I have ever seen.
The young French-Canadien (the only French-Canadien on our team) was not detered by being banished to the 4th line. He stickhandled around an All-Star defenseman, and beat the goalie with a roofer, a Mike-Bossyesque shot.
This goal was an amazing effort. It is the type of goal that makes me want to keep my season tickets, even though the Blues' management have been screwing me over big time in the past couple seasons by raising my ticket prices while heavily discounting tickets for others.
David Perron is the type of player I love to watch. Yet, he is the type of player my beloved Blues love to hate, and to mess with. My prediction is that, if Andy Murray is kept as coach, Perron will be gone within a year.
But why do Murray and Davidson hate this incredible talent? Why do they cut him absolutely no slack? This game tonight is a perfect example: Perron is banished to the fourth line, yet he scores one of the most beautiful goals in Blues' history, even better than the one I saw Red Berensen score against the Rangers in a 2-4 loss in 1969. Why do they hate Perron, and they love Backes and Oshie so much? Don't get me wrong, I like Backes and Oshie, but those two were responsible for the loss tonight. Oshie had an "own goal" on the Pred's second goal, and Backes should have cleared the puck out of the zone with about 12 seconds left tonight, and he failed to do so. Yet, Murray and Davidson still have man-crushes on Backes and Oshie, and hate Perron. Can you imagine what would happen to Perron if he had made the mistakes tonight that Oshie and Backes made??
I admit, I do not know the answer about why Murray hates Perron. On our crappy team, Perron is one of the very few Plus players, just as he was last year. Murray always says he wants more focus or intensity or "urgency" from Perron, yet he puts out mercurial players like Boyes and Tkachuk and Jackman game after game. I have my theory about why Murray does this to Perron, about why he cuts him no slack, but I do not really know Andy Murray, so I do not want to go there right now. I am probably wrong and hope that I am wrong. But there has to be some reason why the French-Candien Perron did not see the ice in overtime tonight.
Sad to say, but I think that it is very unlikely that Perron will be with the Blues for much longer. He is too "something." Cliff Ronning was too "small," yet he had a great 20-year career after we traded him. Rod Brind'Amour was too much the "bod," but he is still playing and has won a Cup. Joey Mullen was too "umm, now I am really stumped: we traded this guy for Gino Cavallini and Charlie Bourgeouis?" My point is, the Blues trade guys like this because of some problem of the coach or management, and our team regrets it.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here's the thing
If Perron doesn’t get that demotion and that wakeup call, I don’t know if he has that jump and that determination to make that goal. The celebration, I thought, was more of a “I told you I could do that!” instead of a “I make goal! Am so very, very happy!”
Perron playing the point on the power play is a sign that he still has a decent role on the team. But it has to be frustrating to be moved down and play less ice time. And when he’s on the ice, it’s with Cam Janssen.
I think Perron will be here for the long haul. Murray, I don’t know.
www.stlouisgametime.com
I agree with your call on the “celebration”. I see this kid missing some passion. I want to see anger, hate and spit in the eyes of a hockey player. There has to be an edge to it, no matter how Phruitty the player is.
I also agree about Murray’s tenure.
No B.S. Catfish met Murray in Nashville yesterday morning. They were at the same hotel. C-Fish said he was incredible to talk to. Fish Plugged GT too.
Thrillin' Booties and Punchin' Faces.
When I was watching the online feed it said that Murray said he wants Perron to “have more urgency” or something fucktarded like that. I seriously don’t know what the hell it was all about though, it kinda made me want to punch murray in the face.
FUCK DETROIT IN EYEBALLS
"Go to sleep bitch! Die motherfucker die! Times up bitch close your eyes!" ~Eminem
"Turned into a monster I'm a motherfucker!!!" ~ Static X
ughh link fail:
ice time: http://forums.stlblues.com/index.php?showtopic=9429
perron answer from murray: http://forums.stlblues.com/index.php?showtopic=9452
david: http://forums.stlblues.com/index.php?showtopic=9488
Murray quote
“So to me, the line that I felt was the weakest was the line of Perron, Patrik Berglund and T.J. Oshie. I felt during that streak when we were playing well, they weren’t as effective as our other lines” What fucking games has he been watching?
Perron not fully banished
After that sweet goal I remember distinctly in the third period when he was put out with Berglund and Oshie. The appears to be nothing more than threatening to send him to Peoria like earlier in the season to light a fire under him. Murray’s criticism about urgency probably stems more from the freakish upside he sees and his desire to see Perron finally come into his own. I just think this is a bit of a fan over reaction on 20 year old.
I see AM's point but his remedy is going to haunt the Blues
Perron is a gifted sniper, there is no doubt. The jock removal he performed last night on Webb and goal was a obvious FU to Murray.
Why no love between the two? Perron just doesn’t perform up to the level he could and it drives AM and me mad. Murray is a control freak, it’s what ran him out of town here in LA.
I’ve posted many times this year I’m not a DP hater but his public skating seasons with the puck and admiring his own stickhandling in the glass is killing us. Other teams have picked up on this and pressure him on the PP because of it. Call it urgency with the puck or whatever, it’s a problem that DP needs to fix.
If not, Perron will eventually tire of the button pushing and move on to another team where he’ll haunt the Blues for many years.
Life is relevant. You can put your hands on a hot stove and a fraction of a second seems like hours. Yet you can put your hands on a hot woman and hours seem to turn into seconds.
If I had to guess
the reason Perron saw no ice time in OT, was Murray was pissed about the exceptionally bad slashing penalty Perron took away from the play while he was getting ice time in the waning moments of the third period.
You can be sure that if Brad Boyes had taken that slashing penalty, he would have been on the ice for the overtime and would have gotten that shot in the shootout. Did any notice what Patrik Berglund did in the game last night? Anyone? No? That’s my point. And don’t get me started on TJ Oshie. He has the effort that Perron should have but he doesn’t have the ability to finish; I hope someday he will. But you can bet that these other guys won’t be demoted to the fourth line or called out in the newspaper. The point is, David Perron isn’t the only player on the ice who doesn’t perform up to his potential in every game. If only we could have a hybrid Perroshie.
These head games have gone beyond just trying to light a fire under the guy. And while I think we can all agree that we could and should see more out of David Perron on a daily basis, he doesn’t deserve the treatment he has been getting from Uncle Andy.
And furthermore, if the Blues get rid of David Perron it will be a huge mistake and will go against everything that this organization has been selling to its fans (re: youth movement, keeping the core players together, etc.). Can anyone imagine where the Blues would be right now if we had kept our core of players from the late 90s early 00s? (Demitra, Hecht, Reasoner, Handzus, Conroy, et al.) Who knows, but, I hate to say, it’s the same reason that (fuck) Detriot has been consistantly good all these years: keeping their team essentially the same.
Anyway, that’s just the 2 cents of a long time reader/lurker.
Perron will remain
I think (hope?) J.D. won’t dump an asset like Perron. The kid is still just so young — and even “young” in hockey years considering his unconventional path to the NHL. I bet J.D. and Perron will be here longer than Murray — so J.D. maybe doesn’t mind having Murray deliver the tough love.
Oh, on the Blues history (gotta love a Shock10 user name!) and the awful Mullen trade: Wasn’t he just “too pricey for cheap Ornest”? My memory is that Calgary knew — as with Gilmour — that the Blues needed to get rid of him because Harry wouldn’t pay him. So Calgary fleeced us.
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
I agree.
Whenever JD talks about Perron, he usually mentions Perron as one of the Blue’s future stars. You can sort of tell by the tone of his voice that he loves the kid.
But I don’t know, no one expected Stempniak to go, Legace to get demoted, etc etc….
These are the days of our lives… Sigh….
by HuntsvilleBlues on Feb 13, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
Haha, I thought of Stempniak as I was telling myself, “surely JD wouldn’t dump Perron.” But I still think Stempniak was a defensible asset swap, and it wasn’t a bad gamble to try to “sell high” on him. Whereas Perron’s much higher ceiling — that is the kind of talent you want to make absolutely sure is Daigle-y before you let him go. Still so young, still probably adjusting to this life, still needs time.
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
Not worthy
Perron is talented, but lazy. If he were as talented as Pavel Bure or Brett Hull, no one (including Murray) would care. But he’s not. So he gets his ice time cut. Cry me a river.
Murray has told him repeatedly what he needs to do to get ice time: play hard, with intensity, EVERY SHIFT, EVERY GAME. Perron either can’t or won’t do it. if Murray keeps throwing him out there on a top line every night despite this, he cuts his own coaching balls off.
My thoughts
I think that Perron needs a wake up call every once in a while. Spectr17 put it very well up there a little bit. Perron is a gifted puckhandler who thinks he’s GOD with a puck…or so it seems to me. He needs to learn to play in a system and let his creativity evolve within the system. It will happen. Until it does, he’ll get banished to 4th line play every couple of months.
As far as other players go…as a coach you have to treat players as individuals. Some players play better when you pull them aside, some when you call them out in the media, some when you visibly put them in their place (the 4th line for a game or a shift or a week)…it all depends.
Still Young
You have to remember that Perron is younger than Oshie and Berglund, and still has some maturity issues. I see Murray’s actions, as hard as they may be to take as a fan, as sort of a “someday you’ll thank me for this” punishment thing.
As somebody already said, if Perron doesn’t respond to this and learn from it, we probably don’t want him around anyway.
I seriously doubt he’d be traded. It would send the wrong message and alienate too many fans (we need somebody left on the team who’s in those TV commercials).
by Mr. Particle on Feb 13, 2009 4:10 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
conflicted
I have thought for most of the season that Murray has had it in for Perron. He’s called him out after some games when it was really obvious that a whole bunch of other players looked a lot worse. I even rationalized that the 4th line demotion might be a way of building the kid’.s confidence. Maybe getting him to think that If he could produce on a line with Jannsen and McClement he could produce with anyone. Then I thought maybe it was a smart move because it was spreading some of the talent around now with MacDonald back and McClement’s very recent ability to find the back of the net . If 8:43 of ice time is all he saw last night, then I have to go back to the simple Murray hates Perron. I’m all for somebody riding the pine for poor play or taking shifts off, but it doesn’t send the right message if it’s not across the board. Jackman’s ass should see about 6 min of ice about every third game. Brewer would have spent most of the first part of the season with splinters in his ass. It’s just not as simple as Perron taking a shift or two off. It’s personal, and it’s obvious as hell.
the most likely reason that Perron gets heat from Murray is because he doesn’t listen to what he tells him to do. on the other hand, if he goes out there and hotdogs it then he’s gonna get put where he’ll be more effective: when you have too much skill, why not be put on a line with guys with almost no skill (Janssen). it balances out in the end
seems like murray is trying to light a spark under the kid, which is fine, but if he keeps getting under ten minutes of ice time down the stretch thats unacceptable. we’re not making the playoffs, the last two games have proven that beyond a shadow of a doubt, so these games now are invaluable in terms of getting the kids minutes in every possible situation to help them down the road.
if it comes to next season and we’re still in this “oh, i just dont know what to do with him” mode regarding perron then we’ll probably have to trade him otherwise the habs are likely to come in with an offer sheet for him, they tend to froth at the mouth at any french canadian forward with talent.
plus, it’s well known that he’s a pest. it’s a GOOD thing thing to have him out there in the final minutes of the game to keep the other team’s mind off their “miracle comeback attack plan”
Dude seems to get under some skin
Is it his mouth or his play that cranks the other teams up? I don’t see him yapping much.
Life is relevant. You can put your hands on a hot stove and a fraction of a second seems like hours. Yet you can put your hands on a hot woman and hours seem to turn into seconds.
if they move perron...
i’m done with this fucking team. We finally start getting some of this talent we have patiently waited for for years and we demote them to the fourth line for brad fucking winchester. This guy isn’t kovalev out there even if he is his favorite player, you can see perron has a passion and a determination to win that I don’t see in a lot of other blues, yet he is punished.
Perron's talent doesn't equal his production - YET.
Honestly, I love the kid’s potential, and that goal in Nashville-wow. But if you’ve watched him game in and game out, he still tends to float around, especially without the puck. He carries the puck too much and relies on stick-handling a lot more than he should – sometimes he just needs to fire it when he’s got a shot instead of trying to make that last little move.
This is just his first full year in the NHL. He should have played in juniors last year, and with most teams, I bet he would have. What you are seeing is growing pains. Fourth line? It’s not like Janssen skates the whole game, usually somebody like Boyes or Oshie gets double-shifted with McClement and Perron. Last night, Berglund wound up on that group and Perron skated with McDonald and Oshie in the third period. He was on the point again on the power play.
You can bitch about which defensemen need a kick in the ass, but we’ve only got 7 left right now. It’s a lot easier to find a forward who will fill their lane, go to the front of the net, and backcheck with some intensity, which is servicable. But if you don’t keep on David Perron at this point in his career, when he does seem to be coachable, then you wind up with Nikolay Zherdev.
I like him on the fourth line
It saves some of his strength for the power play – or OT if needed.
Without good talented shooters to attempt to pass the puck to, he will be forced to shoot it more often – resulting in more goals.
Having Cam Jansen on the ice with him can easily create the right situations for DP to score. Cam is busy checking the other team while anybody else feeds DP the puck for fast break, a 2 on 1, a or 3 on 2. That combination can only result in more goals.
Plus, if the other team is distracted by the possibility of hits from Jansen and the other fourth liners AND the puck skills of DP, it creates more potential for getting under the other team’s skin – resulting in more power plays.
It’s not “personal” – It’s not “magical” – It’s coaching plain and simple. On any given day every player has to be coached differently and Murray has figured out how to coach DP. Don’t be so quick to judge either one of them just yet – or send either one of them packing for the door. You want team unity? Not only does that mean keeping the core players together, but it might just mean keeping the coach who has learned how they tick with them, too.
I’m far from anything but an arm chair GM, but the only thing I haven’t liked so far is a coach using the media to “call out” any player. One of the basics of leadership is to be man enough to go directly to a person and tell them what they are doing right AND what they are doing wrong. Using a “middle man” like the media is weak. It works the same way from the players, too. I even lost the enchantment of Bret Hull when he started mouthing to the media instead of saying it in the locker room. Being an NHL player, coach, or teammate means being a player, coach, and teammate 24/7, on or off the ice, in the locker room, or in front of the media.
"It was one thing to know your heart, another thing to admit it. And something altogether different to allow yourself to follow it." ~R.A. Salvatore

by 

















