Chris Mason proving Blues right
When Emmanuel Legace made only five saves on eight shots at Detroit back on Feb. 3, it marked the probable end of his career in St. Louis. He was costing the team points on a regular basis and whispers from the dressing room said his attitude was caustic ever since the team acquired backup Chris Mason. The fact that his understudy was making more money than him was apparently too much to take and Legace was in effect ruined for the Blues.
That 4-3 shootout loss in Detroit is the demarcation line for Chris Mason's career in St. Louis. That night he stopped all 13 shots in regulation and overtime before failing to secure the win in the shootout. His performance that night foreshadowed what was to come for the bald-headed goaltender.
Posting a record of 4-1-2, he's allowed 13 goals in seven games. For all the non math majors, that's less than two goals a game. If you add his 13 saves with his totals from the seven games he's started, Mason has stopped 187 of 200 shots, a save percentage of 93.5 percent.
It's not like Mason has been dominating in net. He doesn't have a long list of acrobatic or highlight reel saves. But he's been consistent, a steadying force in net that's at least kept the Blues competitive still mathematically eligible for the postseason. In other words, he's given the Blues a chance to win every single night. Let's look at it game to game.
- At Columbus, Blues won 4-2. Mason made 33 saves.
- At home against Edmonton, Blues lost 2-1 in a shootout after he made 22 saves.
- At home against Colorado, the Blues had a 4-1 win on 23 saves.
- At home against Vancouver, the Blues blew a pair of two-goal leads in a 6-4 loss. Mason made 24 saves with the sixth goal coming with an empty net.
- At Nashville, the Blues blew the lead with three seconds left in regulation and lost 4-3 in the shootout. Mason made 31 saves.
- At home against Chicago, Mason posted the 1-0 shutout win making 22 saves.
- At home against the Rangers, the Blues won 2-1 with Mason making 19 saves.
There's a few conclusions from this relatively small sample size. Mason's only faced 30 shots or more twice, and he won one of those games. So the Blues are definitely keeping the number of shots and scoring opportunities down in front of him. Second, the one game the Blues didn't gather any points for the standings, Mason still kept the team in the game and within one goal before he was pulled in the final minutes. Only in one other game has Mason allowed three goals in regulation.
In other words, Mason is giving the Blues a chance to win every single night. He's giving his teammates confidence. Sure they haven't exactly been filling the net on the other end, Mason has meant they haven't had to.
And that's the point, right? You score as much as you need to win. Why waste a few extra goals and kill all the drama of the end of a game. I mean, who didn't expect the Blues to blow the game Monday night against the Rangers when it was tied 1-1 with less than 10 minutes to play in the third? That's drama, baby.
This performance seems to solidify the Blues goaltending situation for next season, at least in terms of who will be the starter. So commenters, do you think this is the real Chris Mason? Do you have confidence in him going forward? Is this the kind of performance we should expect from here on out? Let us know down below.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You know when we first picked up I was stoked.
I felt that looking at the begining of the season for Nashville last year that the players in front of him played atrociously and he kept them in games. Then his confidence went down and he started letting in the kind of goals I’d never seen him let in especially the year before when he compeltely blanketed us.
So I felt hey maybe he can pull his game together. I’m a fan of big netminders because logically they take up more net and it’s harder to score off of them.
Then at the begining of the season he was letting in goals that no NHL netminder should let in and remain a NHL netminder.
Something clicked for him. I mean really, in the game against Vancouver he came up big. There was that one goal that after a deflection and as Sundin lazily skated from behind the net the puck dropped onto his stick with a gaping net wide open. There some tough bounces and at least one goal I think he’d want to have back. Right away I’m thinking, great, back to this bull shit again.
Against Nashville that last goal was another miracle bounce and a seeing-eye puck. Can’t really fault him for it. All Nashville was doing was throwing whatever they could at net because they’ve had a tough time scoring.
I think when a guy plays this solid you can forgive him an off night. That said we can’t really afford too many of those anymore.
His record is lopsided because even back when the Blues were tossing in four goals a night he wasn’t the recepient of that. He lost a game 1-0.
A big trick in this game is get shots on net and crash it. The Blues failed to do it that night and one got by the bearded dragon.
I forgive him. But if he starts reminding me of Hannu after the Colorado tradgedy then I will hate.
Manny had no right. Manny’s a great back up but we never could depend on him to take the full load. He always got injured at important times and always appeared fatigued in the second half of the seasons here.
As far as completely trusting in Mason. I don’t feel it. Hi shistory isn;t as a true starter. The big seasont hat got him the contract came when Vokun was injured and he filled in the majority of the second half in front of a highly talented team. He was great. But then with the mantel on his shoulders to begin last season, a crappy start by his team, he then further faltered, and once Nashville again tried to make him the starter in the second half he was yanked in favor of Ellis. Nashville has little patience with their goaltenders. Why they ever let Vokun go I still can not comprehend. Great goaltending is hard to find.
So unless Mason finds that weird thing some goaltenders tend to find later in years as the trend goes lately, I’m thinking the Blues would serve themselves best trying to find the elite starter they need. Mason is giving them sometime to draft and develop one and that’s good. But history appears not to weigh on Mason’s side yet I’d add a caveat that says history is showing that netminders have strange going ons upstairs and sometimes it takes them a spell to develop. Hell look at our backup.
by Henry Miller's Used Penis on Feb 17, 2009 1:08 AM CST reply actions
Mason
He’s unproven as a steady starter, so no at this point I don’t trust it will last. But he is the right guy for now, he’s on a roll, I bet he lasts the rest of the season if the rest of the team are still competing.
Plus he’s got a midget’s face or head or something…
Lod
So does this mean no more Good Mason, Bad Mason squares on GT Bingo?
As for the questions at hand, I think it’s a wait and see. He’s obviously the man for the rest of this season, but he’s really not a proven every game starter yet.
Used to be Aaron, but some douchebag Celtics fan has that one already.
Mason's biggest (technical) problem
He’s not very quick, so he tends to anticipate from the corner. That’s pretty much why you see some short side goals scored against him. He starts to cheat towards the middle.
That having been said, it’s not like this team has a lot of options in net. I agree that he has been steady, and has given the team a chance to win each night he’s in net, especially when the team limits scoring chances against him. I still think he’s a career backup, but that’s because while he gives the team a chance to win almost every night, but other than the rare headstand (like in Nashville), he’s not going to steal games for you on a regular basis, like Lundqvist almost did last night.
As long as the team is in the playoff hunt, and his limbs are attached, Mason is the guy this year. If the team drops out of the chase, I’d like to see what Chris Holt can do. I think the Blues need to find a goaltender who can help bridge the gap between now and Bishop/Holt/Allen/??? time.
Five words.
The Goalie Guy wrote:
I think the Blues need to find a goaltender who can help bridge the gap between now and Bishop/Holt/Allen/??? time.
Unrestricted free agent Antero Niittymaki.
B.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://www.tomorrowsblues.net
by Tomorrows Blues on Feb 17, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions
Over Harding/Lindstrom/Ellis?
Since they gave Dan Ellis that huge contract, and RInne’s outplaying him, I think Nashville’s going to be looking to dump him.
by The Goalie Guy on Feb 17, 2009 10:50 AM CST reply actions
Again the only two viable goaltenders worth a damn that teams seem willing to trade or a rfa status
Would be Halak and Harding. Maybe FLorida would trade Vokun?
But Nittymaki are you fucking kidding me? Is that so we can have two players with hip surgery on our team next season?
by Henry Miller's Used Penis on Feb 17, 2009 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
Montreal's not trading Halak...
Why should they?
The Blues might offer David Backes money to Harding, but Minnesota would probably match it. If they did, though, then the Blues could throw real money at Backstrom. Minnesota can’t afford to keep ’em both at a total cost of somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million.
I wrote a column about this for Monday; the paper is posted on the front page. Take a look at it.
Niittymaki … Is that so we can have two players with hip surgery on our team next season?
Oh, right, you mean the hip surgery that Niittymaki had last friggin’ October, and which has bothered him so much that he’s 13-5-4 with a 2.59 GAA and 91.6% save percentage…
B.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://www.tomorrowsblues.net
by Tomorrows Blues on Feb 17, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
Why the sarcasm?
Yeah the hip surgery on a player that plays a position that requires the highest bit of mobility and agility. Which means sur he might be good for a few years but it’ll most likely come up again.
Again why would Montreal not trade Halak? I don’t know because of the cap. Because most teams will only put up so much money at certain positions. That’s my rational. Sure right now there’s concern with Price but soon they are either going to be saddled by two decent sized contracts for goaltenders OR they will trade one of them.
Minnesota’s going to resign Backstrom most likely. Unless he’s wanting big money on the open market and buying time for leverage. Either way that opens the gates for Harding. But I have concerns about players that are looking for money above all else. Maybe it works out or maybe the player was in it for the money and not to win. I couldn’t say but because I believe actions speak louder than words, I tend to believe they are mercenaries and mercenaries are poorer troops than the troops who fight for some idea.
Brian I like what you have to say and your ideas and I love conversing about what if’s and shit but none of us have a lock on this knowledge. It’s like a poker hand. You could start out with aces or something much worse and it depends on more than just the cards that come out there man.
by Henry Miller's Used Penis on Feb 17, 2009 6:27 PM CST up reply actions
There are two kinds of goalies...
Ones that have had joint surgery, and ones that haven’t had joint surgery YET …. Grant Fuhr had so many he was practically bionic, yet he served more than adequately in net for us in the twilight of his career.
I wouldn’t rule Antero Nittymaki out just because he’s had surgery. He’s put a lot of pressure on Biron in Philly, thought, and darn near took over the starting role there. As the playoff run hits, it’ll be interesting to see how that shakes out.
I don’t see Montreal making moves with the netminders, but the MN situation looks like one of theirs is one the way out. Anything’s possible.
.... formerly "Tim" of StLouisGameTime.com
by CrossCheckRaise on Feb 17, 2009 8:46 PM CST up reply actions
Sarcasm was a response to the "are you fucking kidding me" comment...
Chris, I don’t see Niittymaki’s hip surgery as a big issue. He had the surgery in October, knowing it was a big risk because this was his contract year. He seems to have responded just fine.
If, as you say, the issue “might come up again in a few years,” in the first place, “might” is a pretty big word, and in the second place, as long as we can get two or three good years out of Niittymaki, that should be all the Blues need before one or all of Bishop, Holt and Allen (plus Karpowich, and whatever goalie they draft this year) are ready to step up to the next level.
As for Harding, I’m all for making a pitch to him as a Restricted Free Agent, because I think Minnesota’s between a rock and a hard place with him an Backstrom. If the Blues go high enough for him, Minnesota won’t match, but I’m still a little leery of the RFA process because the Blues have gotten burned with it before.
I see Niittymaki as a good, reasonably-available, medium-term solution. Harding is a better, long-term solution, but I have some doubts about his availability, and about the ethics/repercussions of these RFA offers. If the Blues start getting a reputation (again) as a bunch of marauding raiders, that could put a serious damper on the effectiveness of Pleau, Davidson, Kekalainen, Armstrong, etc. in future deals.
B.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://www.tomorrowsblues.net
by Tomorrows Blues on Feb 18, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions
Oh sorry. Pay no attention to my use of the word fuck.
I forget that adding it some places has other meanings. I fucking have a bad fucking mouth. ;-) But I didn’t mean it like that man.
My other concern is if I remember correctly because I was In Iraq most of the time wasn’t he given the reign as the starting netminder until Philly went out and brought Biron back in? Didn’t he play in the play offs and not get Philly that far?
Just questions because I’m not going to look it up or anything. But Philly is a bit harsh sometimes on the tenders.
Yeah I have to say that you miight not be too far off with that idea. Not a bad one at all.
I’m suggesting we make a trade with Minnesota say something like Eller or some players from Minnesota. Because sure as shit Minnesota needs some offensive players. I’m like you, not a fan of the RFA route or what the implications fucking fishing around in that pond could and will bring.
by Henry Miller's Used Penis on Feb 18, 2009 5:41 PM CST up reply actions
So do the Blues want to pay Ellis' Big Kontrak?
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://www.tomorrowsblues.net
by Tomorrows Blues on Feb 17, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
Why Nittymaki over Harding/Backstrom?
I’d scream if they traded for Ellis- He’s expensive and unproven. Giving goalies a huge contract after 1 good round of playoffs usually isn’t a smart thing to do. But other than price, why Nittymaki?
Ellis
I don’t know that he’s unable to carry the mantle of starter; he’s young. I think you need to see 3 consecutive years of high productivity before you invest big money/years in a goaltender, then it becomes less of a crapshoot, but it’s still a crapshoot (see Khabibulin, Nikolai). Anybody can have a good year.
But why would the Blues go after a young, unproven goaltender with potential when they’ve got 4 in their system now? That’s why I’d scream. Maybe with the Russian economy in the crapper, Baraulin will change his mind about the US. At least you get paid what they say they’ll pay you, when they say you’ll get paid. I hear that a few KHL teams have had problems with that this year.
I'd welcome Barulin over here; I'd love to see him in Peoria working his way up.
Reto Berra, too.
B.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://www.tomorrowsblues.net
by Tomorrows Blues on Feb 18, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah that'd sure as hell be nice.
Also of note to me is that Atlanta’s Lehtinen(spelling? eek), is supposedly available. Considering he’s always had his save pct over .905 in Atlanta and often times pretty decent, is still young I think he might be worth a gander.
What say you Brian?
by Henry Miller's Used Penis on Feb 19, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions

by 





















