Does Brad Boyes Deserve Making Most Disappointing List?
Say what you will about the relevance of The Hockey News in today's hockey media landscape, they're still pretty good at putting together lists of players because it's kind of easier than writing real stories. Says the guy who spends his spare time writing top 11 lits for a two-bit hockey rag.
The latest list from THN is the 10 most disappointing players this NHL season. The premise is not who are the worst players this season but the guys that had expectations on their shoulders and aren't living up to those expectations. Coming in at fourth place with a bullet is Blues player Brad Boyes. Here's what they have to say about him:
Like Boston, St. Louis has been a disappointment as a whole this season. But Boyes' inability to score anywhere near the pace expected of him makes him the poster boy for the Blues in Missouri. The man who scored 76 goals combined the past two seasons is on pace for just 15 this year.
On it's face, that's a mostly fair comment. But if you look at it a little closer, I question if he's totally deserving of this honor.
First of all, they're only judging him on his goals scored. Granted, that's why he has a decent contract in the NHL, but it's not like he's not contributing. His 34 points leads the Blues. Granted, that sucks and is part of the indictment of the whole team. His 24 assists are right on pace for his total of 39 a year ago. And that minus-2 rating? Worlds better than the minus-20 he put up last year. And the writer compares his goals this year (which are incredibly low) to his two year total which includes a 43-goal season. He has to go back two seasons to cherry pick that comparison.
The drop-off for Boyes' goal scoring can be traced to two columns. The first is power play goals. You can see above that he has two this year. Last year he scored 16. Is it his fault the power play hasn't connect this year? Maybe, but I think you could argue the puck movement and the general disorganization of that thing combined with a lack of scoring threat from the blue line are more to blame than one player not finishing chances.
The second stat related to his decreased scoring will not be a surprise to folks around here. Boyes' shooting percentage is in the toilet compared to his last two seasons. When he scored 43 goals, he connected on an absurdly high 20.8 percent of his shots. To put that in perspective, only Henrik Sedin and Tomas Fleischmann are shooting above 20 percent this season and neither are on pace to get 200 shots on net like Boyes did two years ago.
Last season when Boyes scored 33 goals, his shooting percentage fell off like you would expect. He connected on 15 percent of his shots. His times hitting the net were up from 207 to 220. This year? It's an abysmal 7.8 percent. To put that in perspective, there are 260 players in the NHL with better shooting percentages than Brad Boyes this season. Shocking, I know.
So in the end, has Boyes disappointed? I think that's a safe call. But has he had the fourth most disappointing season in the league? I kind of doubt it. Another players on the list: Pavel Datsyuk.
What's your take, fair commenters? Let us know down below. And be sure to come back for the Game Day Thread. It promises to be quite the event on the Internets.
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
Yes and no
He’s supposed to be a goal scorer. That’s his job. He scored 43 goals, he got paid to score more. Last year he hit 30, and that was great. This year? Not so much.
He needs to score goals — not get assists. The +/- is better, but the power play goals are just embarrassing. Goal scorers score goals. No excuses. Shoot the fucking puck. At the net, please.
That being said, is he more disappointing that the artist formerly known as Paul Kariya? Mr. New Hips has 23 points in 46 games. Last year he had 15 in 11 games. With the new hips, we were told he was feeling better, skating better and playing like his old self. Now? Alex Steen is outperforming him.
have to say yes....
And not just because of the scoring drought. Boyes, to me, is a one dimensional player, and to that end, he isnt what he could be….pure offensive talent.
Take Datsyuk. Sure, he is not going to net 90+ points this year like he has for the past 3-4 seasons, but the guy is a dirty wizard on defense. Absolute glue. He still sets up the play in the zone, can still kill you if he gets the puck on the low boards or if you give him a look in the slot. Boyes doenst do any of these things, not that I expect him to. My problem is that I can in all the games I watch and attend, how utterly weak he is with puck possession. In the ducks game, he must have (accidentally) intercepted 4 passes in the neutral zone or just inside their blueline and gave the puck right back to them. Its ridiculous. The accuracy and the bad puck possession is bad enough, but he gets knocked off the puck with a tap. If Kariya wasnt still wearing the same skates he wore in ’95, I would have trouble telling the two apart.
I think he needs a team full of company on the list.
Let's go Blues!!!
by Milo. on Jan 27, 2010 5:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions
To be fair
SOG doesn’t include pucks that hit posts, crossbars or that go 2 feet wide of an empty net. When you add in those, I do believe his shooting percentage is negative.
by PersonalJustice on Jan 27, 2010 5:47 PM CST reply actions 5 recs
I'll add another Rec for good measure.
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday." -- Don Marquis
The Blue Note Zone - BY Blues fans, FOR Blues fans!
You can't just argue this with numbers anyway.
Because part of the equation is expectation vs. reality, and expectation isn’t seen in the numbers. Obviously a lot of people expected him to trend upward and he’s trending downward instead. Expectations are somewhat rooted in past performance, but it can’t be completely summarized with numbers.
Well
Mr “high and wide” has been disappointing – but the fourth most disappointing? That’s a tough one – I’d put him in the top 10 but lower down.
His plus/minus has improved, he’s still shooting (and missing….), getting a bunch of assists so he IS contributing to the team.
But yeah – disappointing as holy hell.
BLUE SKIES - new St Louis Blues hockey blog.
"If you prick me, do I not...leak?"
"I could be chasing an untamed ornithoid without cause."
"I am programmed in multiple techniques, a broad...variety of pleasuring..."
RIP Lt Commander Data
The tripe about Boyes' ain't the worst thing in this edition
For me, the worst was the puff piece on Mike Richards. It was enough to make be decide not to renew my subscription, but that’s another matter.
No. BB’s streaky. He’s more likely to go on a goal-scoring tear for the rest of 09-10 as he is to continue in the rut in which he finds himself presently.
like you said
he gets paid to score goals and hes on pace for less than half of last year’s total
that’s pretty disappointing, no matter how much more responsible he is in his own zone
Deserved.
With that contract and all.
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday." -- Don Marquis
The Blue Note Zone - BY Blues fans, FOR Blues fans!
Where's Dennis Wideman?
How is he not on this list?
I have seen many posts from Blues fans wishing they coud re-do the Boyes/Wideman trade. Obviously these people do not pay any attention to the Bruins.
Boyes may be a dissapointment, but at least he’s not awful. Dennis Wideman right now? AWFUL!
by forgetyerskatesdream on Jan 28, 2010 8:19 AM CST reply actions

by

























