Who's Up Next? Blues Beat Rangers.
In the interest of not angering the hockey gods who have been so good to us so far this season, I am not going to mention several items. Those items include:
- This Blues team now owns the best start in franchise history.
- This Blues team has posted four shutouts in just 12 games.
- This defense is allowing the fewest shots against in the league (26.5/game) and is also leading the league in fewest goals against per game (1.42).
- This team is playing without several of its better players and is still playing a creative, exciting game and playing confidently despite the inexperience of the team, especially on defense.
Instead I'm going to go a little negative tonight, hockey gods, just so you know that we appreciate what we have, but still see room for improvement. To wit:
- The offense has got to get on track. Sure it's great that Alexander Steen got on the board again and that he also added the empty-netter, but he and his three goals need to get going. On top of that, Andy McDonald only has two goals and several players who should be scoring only have one: T.J. Oshie, David Backes, Brad Boyes and Erik Johnson should all have more than that. I have no idea how you go about fixing this, but if it doesn't get back on track for these guys, a losing streak is definitely on the horizon.
- The power play is dreadful right now. This system of trying to set up the backside man on the half boards for a one-timer isn't working, it's definitely time to switch things up and try something else. They have seven power play goals on the season and their conversion with the man-add is a pitiful 11.9%, good for 25th in the whole league.
Other than that, great work out of Ty Conklin in his first work in a decade, and thank you refs for blowing the whistle a little early to help the Blues rather than screw them for one.
Finally, I understand why B.J. Crombeen gets five minutes for boarding, but that exact play happens several times a game. The only difference is that Stepan made a weird cut at the end that caused him to duck down, putting him in a way more vulnerable position. No way does Crombeen expect that and no way is he attempting to injure the Rangers player.
In Columbus on Wednesday followed by home against Nashville on Thursday. Oh, and we'll be here all week for you.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Halak on Wednesday, Conklin at home on Thursday?
Or vice versa?
Columbus has the better record of the two right now, although Nashville is probably the better team top-to-bottom.
maybe Halak for both games?
Put Conklin in on Saturday against Phoenix to give Halak a rest…
http://www.stlouisgametime.com/
I’d say, use Conklin on either Wednesday or Thursday. I’m not a real fan of using any goalie in back to backs. They never seem to be as sharp in the second game in a row.
Rocking the Red since 1975
If the Blues had a stiff for backup...
… coughBuffalocough…
… then I’d lean towards giving Halak both games. But with Conklin as the #2, I think the Blues should have no reservations about using both goalies in back-to-back games.
I’d go Halak @CBJ and Conklin vs. NAS. But man, it’s nice to have choices like this.
That $100 million can buy some good defense and backup goalies...
But hey, you pays yer penny and you takes yer chances… and now Lou is failing miserably.
by Paperwork Ninja on Nov 8, 2010 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
my two cents
You answered thought #1 with thought #2. The scoring will come IF and only if we get the power play going. When Brad Boyes was scoring 30+ goals like 5 years ago or whenever, a lot of his tallies were on the PP. Same for McDonald and Berglund two years ago, for that matter. More cross-ice one-timers from the faceoff dots, etc. We don’t try for that anymore.
The Crombeen penalty… 5 minutes seemed harsh. Wasn’t really malicious and Stepan did half the job by putting himself low and off-balance. Even a double minor would’ve been more appropriate.
Really, I’m just pumped we can keep winning on the road here with so many of our regulars out injured. I don’t care if they are ugly, close wins, or not. I mean, we’ve got Oystrick and Nikitin out there killing penalties or taking the point on the power play, and doing a half decent job of it.
http://www.stlouisgametime.com/
Is there a chance that Crombeen gets suspended? I must confess I don’t know his rap sheet on the disciplinary front.
I know there’s a rule about if the same major penalty offense if done within a certain time interval (I believe it’s 120 days), an automatic suspension is given.
Rocking the Red since 1975
There is a chance
But not because of past performance. The way things are going this season, it’s very close on this type of call. However, BJ is definitely not a dirty player, and hasn’t had a similar penalty previously.
How old would you be if you didn't know how old you are? - Satchel Paige
If he’s a “first time” offender for that type of offense, he probably won’t get a suspension. If he’s done the same offense before, than a suspension could result.
(Last season, Alex Ovechkin got suspended for boarding Campbell as Campbell was hurt and he had a previous boarding offense earlier in the year.)
Rocking the Red since 1975
Also he's Colin Campbell's son.
Barret Jackman is my hero.
Fueled. These new shores burn. Shadow, my sweet shadow, to you I look no more.
Good to see that Stepan Isn't Injured
That was an unlucky check. If Stepan doesn’t catch the bad edge that’s just Crombeen running him along the boards… I can understand the 5 minutes though and I’d expect the same if the players were reversed.
Other than that, I was listening to the Rangers broadcast tonight and I liked their Backes = The Hulk replay where they explained that “you wouldn’t like him when he’s angry.”
After Thornton got 2 for his actions against Perron . . .
even if Stepan isn’t injured, I don’t see how The Beej doesn’t get at least 1 for that hit. Even if it really wasn’t totally illegal.
Then again, maybe I’m a pessimist. Which at times I am. But I fully don’t expect him to be playing Wednesday regardless. Just a sinking feeling.
St. Louis Game Time . . . I need another beer.
And I can also write things in 140 characters or fewer.
GODDAMN!!!!
I can’t wait until Christmas to get in town and see this TEAM! Wish I could be catching more action than I am.
GO BLUES!
my points
1. i used to have to try and explain how pre-buttman low scoring hockey was actually fun to watch. well. just re-watch those two games. 1-0 and 2-1 games can be fun to watch. should be fun to watch.
2. winning=brilliance. last year .pleau- idiot. macinnis. idiot. murray. idiot. jarmo idiot. wait a sec the blues are the best in hockey? drafting is incredible, trades are incredible, coaching is incredible, the chopper’s input is right on the trolley, jd and checketts do know when they have a good team. how in the world did all the blues management parts get so smart in 3 short months.
3. we are not one finisher away from being a great team. we are a great team. still. a finisher would be an excellant xmas present.
I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth ... while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.
by Childhood Trauma on Nov 8, 2010 8:23 AM CST reply actions
That is one of the mroe dangerous things about the Blues
Yeah or scoring needs to get going. The above mentioned players need to start catching fire in the worst way. That being said, I think one of the most dangerous things about the team right now is that teams don’t know how to defend them because they don’t know where the scoring is coming from.
I know a sniper coming in would be amazing, but if we keep winning, I don’t care if one shows up or not.
Barret Jackman is my hero.
Fueled. These new shores burn. Shadow, my sweet shadow, to you I look no more.
Completely agree...
I think one of the most dangerous things about the team right now is that teams don’t know how to defend them because they don’t know where the scoring is coming from.
This team reminds me somewhat of the 1980-81 club, which had ten players score at least 20 goals. Five of those guys had 30-plus, though… so in keeping with the forced negativity theme here (to appease the Hockey Gods), yeah, this team needs to get some of the goal-scorers moving. Boyes, Backes, Perron, Oshie, McDonald… I’m looking in your direction.
This team could, however, just as easily be the 1979-80 Blues, who had five 20-goal scorers and six more guys who hit double figures.
Also, the 1979-80 and 1980-81 Blues featured the goaltending tandem of Liut and Staniowski, both of whom had better goals-against averages in 1979-80 than in 1980-81…
…but the 1979-80 club lost 34 of 80 games because of less goal-scoring, where the ’80-81 club was 45-18-17 despite Liut giving up 199 goals in 61 games for a 3.34 GAA. He had a 3.18 in 64 games in 1979-80.
That was a different era, thiough, where a GAA of around 3.00 was the standard, and anything below 3.00 was outstanding.
B.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Nov 8, 2010 12:56 PM CST reply actions
Jesus, I remember all that like it was yesterday... has it REALLY been thirty friggin' years?
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Nov 8, 2010 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
Damn....
I wont be on at all wednesday and I might not even get to see any of the game……I have to stay over after work tuesday night into wednesday for CPR recert……so I wont be home wednesday till like 1pm after working from 7pm tuesday till 7a wednesday……..and I gotta get some sleep cause Im back into work at 1015 wednesday night so i gotta fit soem sleep in there
I still maintain Vladimir Konstantinov got what he deserved...If you can't handle that then kiss my ass......
"I've got a bad feeling about this..."

by 




























