Cam Janssen Suspended Five Games For Hit On Matt Bradley - TWO UPDATES
The NHL wheel of justice spun round and round for Blues enforcer Cam Janssen today. Apparently the wheel stopped on the "five-game suspension" square.
Let's start with the hit. Bradley had clearly passed the puck and had his head turned while skating along the boards, not looking at the hard-charging Janssen. Watch the video.
It is interesting if you watch the entire clip, Darren Pang, Bernie Federko and John Kelly start out defending Janssen and the hit. By the end, Pang says, "Wow, Janssen isn't known for that." So clearly on review the play was dirty. We haven't really talked about it around here because after the game was over, the Blues scattered for the ongoing Olympic break, but it's easy to see Janssen was in the wrong.
Let's talk timing and the five games. Is it a coincidence that the decision came down the day after the Capitals returned to practice? According to Bradley himself in a quick interview with the Washington Post, he's alright and doesn't have any longterm effects from the hit.
"I was a little disoriented," Bradley said of Janssen's controversial hit. "But I was fine a little bit after that, and I was fine the next day. I felt great out there today.
"I just got my bell rung," he added, before cracking, "I'm a good bleeder and I can recover quick from getting my bell rung, I guess."
If Bradley had a concussion and was suffering from post-concussion syndrome, would Janssen have gotten more than five games? Why else would the league wait from the time of the hit, Feb. 13, until today, Feb. 25? I'm torn about that thought. The punishment should fit the crime, but does that also include the severity of the injury or just the flagrant nature of the action? I honestly don't know.
The five-game suspension will cost him more than $14,000 in salary and keep him out of action until March 14. And that's troublesome for a Blues team sitting four points out of the final playoff spot in the Western Conference. Five games is a quarter of their 20 remaining games. Janssen has provided a spark when he's in the lineup, and not just with his fighting. With the hit on Bradley, he was trying to encourage more physical play and get his team and the home crowd against a top opponent fired up. Clearly he crossed the line. And I think it's safe to say the Blues will miss him those five games.
I'm sure the fact that Janssen has zero points and more than 160 penalty minutes didn't help in deciding the length of suspension, but it's not like he's a repeat offender. I did a quick search and found only one previous suspension back in 2007 when he was still a Devil. I don't remember him getting a suspension as a Blue.
One more thing. On what has been billed as the real Twitter feed for Janssen, he had talked about the hit. Those comments are now gone. Interesting. Lends credence to the fact that it's him. And on Twitter, I believe he said he saw that Bradley had passed the puck and hit him anyway. Anyone find the cached tweets, put 'em in the comments.
UPDATE: Our friends over at Japer's Rink had posted them:
- I know the fans want to know about the hit on Bradley. It was back to back games and I felt the boys needed a lift as I always try to do
- Its my job to set the tone early and play with that edge. In the situation w/ Bradley I thought the puck was in his skates.
- Unfortunately the play had been made but @ that point I was already commited to my hit. As I do I try 2 hit with as much force as possible
- After watching the replay of the hit I felt bad. It is part of the game and I talked to Bradley after. There might be a suspention involved
- I will keep you updated. Thanks fans your the best!
Well...he had remorse, didn't he? He "felt bad." And I don't believe the comment that he thought the puck was in his skates. There was a pretty decent delay and plenty of ice to cover before Janssen laid the hit. But I'd probably say the same too knowing the wheel of justice was spinning.
UPDATE TWO: The always resourceful and fast Jeremy Rutherford already has lots of feedback from Janssen. Here's a highlight, but definitely click the link because there's lots of good stuff.
"I was surprised by the five," Janssen said. "We had a great hearing and everybody said what they had to say and they still gave me five games. It is what it is and I'm going to have to accept it. I respect Colin Campbell's decision and what he says, but it's not going to change my style whatsoever."
What say you commenters? Fair or unfair on the suspension? What's this mean to the team? Let us know, down below.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bullshit.
Not a repeat offender, no track record at all of dirty hits, showed remorse, no injury, and most important of all, no intent to injure. How in the hell can they give him five games suspension when they give people far less for significantly worse? Mike Green got three games for the elbow on Michael Frolik, which was significantly worse and intentional. If you take a look at the suspensions for this year, the only other five game regular season suspension was on Laraque for a knee on knee of Kronwall, which was intentional and came from someone with a history. Hell, Sutton’s awful boarding of Dupuis only got 2 games. Did Andy cry?
This is unwarranted, and I agree with Brad, has a really weird timing – right at the start of Capitals practices? What? If they knew they were going to suspend him, do it at the event of the incident. Don’t wait until 2/3rds of the Olympics are over before you pipe up and you say something. The wheel of morality needs to be tightened up. There are no standards, no consistency applied… unless you count DGB’s flow chart.
Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
eh
he has a record. ask any leafs fan.
cam deserved to be suspended. someone got hurt, so the logic is that someone must get suspended. it was kinda dirty, most def late. 3-5 games was my guess.
its not like the team is losing someone good. king slides into the lineup and will try to show that his hand is healed. its kind of a win-win — less options making out the lineup card.
No, I think he deserved to be suspended, for sure.
But no more than three games – the number of games in a suspension is so arbitrary. It’s like they throw darts or something.
Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
Agreed
it’s the inconsistency from the NHL that’s a total bitch. Look at Steve Ott. The guy only gets the odd game suspension for what he does. Getzlaf gets away with a blatent knee on knee. Janssen made a mistake. Ott’s actions and Getzlaf’s were intentional.
The NHL is very much like the refereeing. Inconsistent, mystifying, obtuse…
BLUE SKIES - new St Louis Blues hockey blog.
"If you've come to apologize, I forgive you for hitting me with your crutch. I'm so glad my head didn't break it."
"If you mean time traveling bunnies, then yes."
"Destiny John, is a fickle bitch."
Benjamin Linus - resident "Lost" badass and all round sexy dude.
by drfrankentweed on Feb 25, 2010 5:05 PM CST up reply actions
was at the game and it happened
right below me, but i didnt see it cos i was watching the play. does that mean cam can check me too? lol.
no seriously. i had to wait for the replay, and i thought it was late. worse, i got the tony twist review of it after i got home, whom i believe listed cam as the number one reason we won that game. I said when we got cam i hated him and would stop wathcing the blues if he ran around injuring people (and had an incident in his pre blues days) however in the note, as far as i’m concerned cam is a “clean” agitator (as far as it goes) respects the game, the fans, the players, and loves being in the loo. i’d take two games off just for that.
hell buttman doesnt do any of those things!!
relooking at the backes hit (video on game time about half a week lower) i thought backes was the better hit. the player he bonked had the puck in his skates, and the player he bonked was unprepared for several reasons (he just sumersaulted, he from europe, cam was yelling SMASH from the second row, etc) since the feed we got is forgien, the only thing i’d question would be if the elbow was high. NOT because backes elbowed the guy, but merely because the guy was looking at his skate laces and hunched over when hit.
those wacky euro games though, anything near the head is an instant guilt trip
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Feb 25, 2010 5:02 PM CST reply actions
It's the NHL.
Unnecessary hit, appropriate in-game punishment, unnecessary suspension.
Janssen’s role is to run around and hit people. “Cam Smash” does what he does. But if he knew that Bradley no longer had the puck, and chose to make the hit anyway, that’s just stupid on his part. There was plenty of emotion in the building at that point; Janssen’s hit wasn’t needed to wake up his teammates or the crowd. His subsequent “fight” with Quintin Laing got much more reaction than the hit itself.
For the dirty hit, Janssen received a five-minute major and a game misconduct. Absolutely appropriate given the circumstances. This underlines the stupidity of committing to the hit; Janssen could have put the entire team into a deep, deep hole in the first half of the first period. In retrospect, Laing’s belligerence may have saved the night for the Blues; his dual minors for instigating and roughing negated four of Cam’s five penalty minutes. The Caps scored during the fifth minute.
If Matt Bradley had stood up from the hit and skated off the ice, there would be no suspension. But the NHL likes to base its punishment on the result of a misdeed, rather than the misdeed itself; so a suspension really can’t be a surprise. Cheap shot, no injury? Carry on. Cheap shot, injured player? Hammer time.
The length of the suspension is the only surprise. Five games seems excessive; I wonder whether the same ruling would have occurred if Bradley played for the Thrashers or Coyotes or some other team that doesn’t have a league-anointed superstar and a league-leading record. The length sucks for Janssen, but I don’t expect it to hurt the team all that much. DJ King was a better player than Janssen until he turned into Mr. Glass; if he’s able to stay healthy for those five games, the team as a whole won’t be hurt.
except
the major interferences was partially negated by an instigator if i remember correctly.
the fact that i even know there are 5 min majors fro interference meant the refs were pretty unhappy with the the play as well.
again they used to have a “match” penalty, but with all this suspension behind the seasons, and games being taped and what not, i’m not even sure a match penalty is still on the books
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Feb 25, 2010 5:45 PM CST up reply actions
there have been two this year
twice this year, opponents of the blues have been given match penalties. . . one was given for tape on a wrist during a fight. . .. i do not remember the details
ahhh
i do actually remember the tape thing. how federal league. didnt know it was a match, however that sort of thing muight be match by definatiion not by ref choice. but at least the match penalty exists still.
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Feb 26, 2010 11:04 AM CST up reply actions
heres my 2 cents (not that anyone really cares)
im fine with the initial penalty that was called… it was interference, he did appear to be hurt on the play so that is automatic 5 and a game misc. that i have no problem with
i agree with the suspension to some degree.. it was a late hit.. he didnt necessarily hit him up high really.. i think it was clean except for the late part.. 5 seems a little excessive but whatever.. hopefully dj can fill that gap and give us that spark that cam gives us every night
If you have a donkey and i have a chicken and youre donkey ate my chickens feet what would you have.... 2 feet of my cock in youre ass!! haha
dirty hit, no doubt
deja vu all over again ask Kaberle, if he has any recall of those tweety birds in that game. Way late hit, elbow, appears to be jumping again off his feet but that is open to debate.
If the refs won’t mete out fair punishment the players should, or at least they used to. The cure for that dirty late shit is the butt end. Once you plant one in a guy ‘s solar plexes that is charging in full steam ahead I guarantee you he ain’t coming in like that again, if he even stays in the game. Then agin if you miss, you’d better be good with your paws.
Just a chew toy for the hockey gods
2nd wind
and furthermore LOL
I dig Cam’s energy but he can still do his thang and stay out of the box and off the suspension list. With those late hits and leaving his feet Cam becomes a liability as Brad points out.
As far as needing Cam on the roster I think Kinger would give us almost the same energy charge from hits and be able to handle the heavyweights, unlike Cam. For those who say the era of the goon has passed and we don’t need knuckledraggers, well, put yourself on the other end of this hit. Say Teej or Poutine gets waylaid by a goon who ya going to ask to step up? Crombeen? Backes? Weaver? Please. You carry a goon as a deterrent for this shit. Cam had to answer to no one on that game due to the Caps not having an enforcer. Yeah I know Cam drew the gamer but he could have stayed in the game too and knocked out another Cap. What’s to stop him?
Call fairy penalties, put windsheilds on the players, tie their jerseys down like horse saddles but sweet jeebuz, allow us old farts at least one pugilist and a fight once a every couple of games.
Just a chew toy for the hockey gods
I don't think the Caps regret their lack of an enforcer...
Not afraid to nitpick
by joker24 on Feb 25, 2010 7:38 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
my personal caps fan point of view
The NHL is getting tougher on penalties. Green had a 3 gamer for an elbow, his first suspension. Normally that would have been 2. A suspension of some sort was clearly warranted. 5 seems a bit long, but I think that’s just the direction the NHL is going on, and I’m fine with that. I hate seeing players get injured.
To that degree, the Caps totally don’t need an enforcer, and I don’t really think they have a role in the modern NHL. Play a few minutes, but don’t do much productive. Matt Bradley is sorta the Capitals “enforcer”, and he rallies the team as much by bleeding as actually winning a fight. The NYR just cut Brashear. Fighters are an old holdover from the prelockout era. Not much use in todays NHL.
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Habs cut Huggy Bear cuz he wouldn't fight
Haven’t heard why the Rags cut him but it may be the same reason. If you’re an enforcer your expected to answer the bell.
Just a chew toy for the hockey gods
5 games is what I expected
Even if Cam thought Bradley had the puck, he clearly jumped into the hit and it looks like he lead with his elbow. However, as much as I like Cam, I don’t buy his “I thought he had the puck” excuse. Bradley’s stick was up from the time Cam started lining him up, so unless Cam thought they were playing soccer he’s full of crap.
As far as the timing goes, Bob McKenzie mentioned at the start of the break that the NHL was going to wait until Cam appeared at the hearing, and Cam had already planned a vacation, which they let him go on.
Chicagoan in the Lou.
I found an artists' rendering of the NHL's discipline committee hearings.
I would definitely give it points for accuracy.

Reporter: There`s a "stamp out the Beatles movement" underway in Detroit. What are you going to do about it?
Paul McCartney: We`re going to start a campaign to stamp out Detroit.
by hildymac on Feb 25, 2010 9:06 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
My response is better in blog form.
So fuck it. Here it is.
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday." -- Don Marquis
The Bluenote Zone - Because you KNOW you want to know more about the St. Louis Blues!
And thanks to The Good Doctor and to you, Brad.
St. Louis Game Time: Fuck Those Who Suspend Our Favorites!
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday." -- Don Marquis
The Bluenote Zone - Because you KNOW you want to know more about the St. Louis Blues!
2 games was about right
5 is just them being fuckheads pretending they are tough on discipline while star players can through elbows to the head and skate away if no one was hurt.
He raged at the world, at his family, at his life. But mostly he just raged.
Star players get off?
Are Ovechkin and Mike Green not star players? Both have been suspended.
They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
and pronger
someone post that penalty decision flow chart suspension thing that had the whole pronger sub routine.!!
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Feb 26, 2010 11:07 AM CST up reply actions
well
2-3 about right. i think the extra 2-3 is for him being a repeat.
so IF 2-3 game is about right for something that dnagerous the question is:
is it a valid practice to hand out extra games to known scum or no?
A strong anvil fears no hammer
by Childhood Trauma on Feb 26, 2010 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
Five games is probably too much.
I’d agree that five games is too much. Bettman has to look out for his high profile teams, he has to protect the Caps and the Penguins. I would probably be more if it was the NBC Sunday Penguins game of the week. What a doucher.
It was a dirty hit though, so in the end, I would rather see the league clamp down to protect everyone. So I HOPE this sets a precedent so that the Hollowegs, Parros, and Otts of the world get 5 – 10 games from now on.
Campbell is a D-bAg
Never liked him, cant believe he gets paid to show force on guys who are not in the "golden boy’ category. I bet he’s flexing in a mirror all by himself right now. Jans was wrong, but 5 games with no history is a joke on Campbell’s previous decisions… or indecisions.

by 


















