Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Playing Payne: Lines You Should Be Using

I don't want to pretend like I know more than coach Davis Payne, but he doesn't try to tell me how to loom like an accountant and he's pretty good at that, so we'll just call this an free exchange of information.

Tinker all you want, overthink all you want, Davids, but the tried-and-true NHL model is this:

  1. Roll four lines, giving the top scoring minutes to lines one and two, the top checking assignment to line three and the energy/secondary checking line role to line four. If line three and four can also score from time to time, all the better.
  2. As best as possible, each line should have a playmaker, a sniper and a power forward.
  3. Your defensive pairings should be one offensive-minded guy and one defensively-responsible guy.
  4. Your defensive pairings should have one right hander and one left hander (harder to do since only 30% of NHL blueliners are righties.

 

All that said, here are the lines you should be using, D-Payne.

FORWARDS

T.J. Oshie (sniper) - Patrik Berglund (playmaker) - Chris Stewart (power forward)

Alexander Steen (playmaker) - David Backes (power forward) - Matt D'Agostini (sniper)

Vladimir Sobotka (playmaker) - Jason Arnott (power forward) - Jamie Langenbrunner (power forward)

Evgeny Grachev - Scott Nichol - Chris Porter 

DEFENSE

Barret Jackman (LH, defensive) - Alex Pietrangelo (RH, offensive)

Roman Polak (RH, defensive) - Kevin Shattenkirk (RH, offensive)

Nikita Nikitin (LH, offensive) - Carlo Colaiacovo (LH, offensive)

GOALTENDING

Jaroslav Halak

Brian Elliott

 

The only assignments that go against my rules are on the second and third pairings, where I've put two right handers together and two left handers together. Bring Kent Huskins back (lefty) and everything goes back to normal as Jackman slides down one pair, Polak switches to the right side on the third pair and Colaiacovo switches back to the left side (only on the right because I'd rather have the vet playing his off-hand side).

Go ahead and ignore me, Davis, but you know I'm right - this is the lineup you should be running 90% of the time.

I assume some of you might disagree, tell me where I'm wrong in the comments.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I may not have intimate knowledge of hockey strategy, and I am speculating here

but something tells me that Payne is not actually in charge and the strings are being pulled by bennett and shaw.

St Louis Blues - Season Ticket Holder - Sec 106
SUTA
Twitter: @jdandturkelton
What Exactly is a God Wand?
Anyone who says "Nuff said" or "Need I say more?" needs to be elbowed in the cock.

by I_AM_SPARTACUS on Nov 2, 2011 11:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I do have a disagreement.

My choices

Oshie-Berglund-Stewart
Sobe-Backes-Dags
Steen-Arnott Langenbruner
Grachev-Nichol-Porter

I’d leave the defense as it is, although I think I’d sit Nikitin until he figures out what he’s doing out there. Either give Chorney the chance or call up Cole and see what he can do, but for the most part our D hasn’t been our problem.

I don’t see why they broke up the SOB line. They were really generating quality chances and were starting to click.

The Backes line I have isn’t ideal, but I think they all play the same type of game and will work their tails off to get some pucks.

The "3rd’ line has been our best and I really think breaking them up would be a mistake.

Barret Jackman is my hero.

In remembrance of Pavol Demitra and all our fallen Blues brethren.

by BluesTiger on Nov 2, 2011 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Basically all of this.

Don’t get at all the mindset of breaking up the 3rd line. More so from people who give the Note shit for breaking up SOB. You want that line back together because they produced, but you want to break Arnott and Steen, who seem to have excellent chemistry, to try to quick fix the Backes line?

The one disagreement I have is they should move Vodka to line 4 in order to give Grachev a shot on the Backes line. Grachev has been solid in my book, why not try him out on a scoring that is struggling to produce anyway?

Is willing to go to the mattresses with the lot of yous.

by Novacain on Nov 2, 2011 1:03 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree

To an extent, since grachev is a bergy type

going through the handshake line at my game the other night, guy says youre still a prick Evan...me: yep sure am next time stop me from scoring

by DESTROYER on Nov 2, 2011 7:09 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

i agree with the line combos

however, i would switch the top 2 lines… oshie has zero business getting first line minutes and most nights i wouldnt consider him good enough for 2nd line minutes.. Other than that I think this is pretty spot on how it should be

If you have a donkey and i have a chicken and your donkey ate my chickens feet what would you have.... 2 feet of my cock in your ass!! haha

by bleedblue2009 on Nov 2, 2011 12:37 PM CDT reply actions  

I personally don't give a shit.

But stop changing the fucking lines every other shift.

PC Load Letter? What the fuck does that mean?

by DanGNR on Nov 2, 2011 12:52 PM CDT reply actions  

they wouldnt change

if the top line ever scored a goal that counted

And a harvest of righteousness is grown from the seed of peace planted by peacemakers.

by Childhood Trauma on Nov 2, 2011 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flip-flop Steen with Oshie and you got it...

Based on what I’ve seen, Oshie has performed definitively better with Backes than he has with Berguland. I haven’t looked at the numbers, but I’m willing to believe that Oshie’s numbers are better when he plays with Backes as well. Steen fits better with Berglund and Stewart. It might also be worth mentioning that Steen is the only player that has earned a top six spot so far on the team.

by Porgi on Nov 2, 2011 1:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Bring back Glumac

That’ll solve things.

No beer and no TV make Homer...something something.

by Poor College Student on Nov 2, 2011 2:30 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

And Shishkhanov

Don’t forget Shishkhanov.

Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not. - Thomas Jefferson

by Dan. on Nov 2, 2011 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

NO LOVE FOR PETR CAJANEK!

DAMN YOU.

Fight Club writer for the print edition of St. Louis Game Time . . . I need another beer.
The Throwdown Lowdown Report, only on The Bluenote Zone.
And I can also write things in 140 characters or fewer.

by Donut King on Nov 2, 2011 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pressbox hall-of-famer...

Simon Gamache is super pissed nobody’s mentioned his name yet.

by forgetyerskatesdream on Nov 3, 2011 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

What about.

Mr. Pilon?
HE could solve our static PP.

PC Load Letter? What the fuck does that mean?

by DanGNR on Nov 3, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jane,

you ignorant slut

No beer and no TV make Homer...something something.

by Poor College Student on Nov 3, 2011 12:19 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

The only line that's working well is Steen-Arnott-Langenbrunner

I’d almost be willing to push them to the first line, follow it with Sobe-Backes-D’Agostini then put the SOB line in 3rd, with a Grachev-Nichol-Porter line in 4th. When McDonald and Perron come back, you can juggle the lines a little more.

Let's Go Blues!
Support your local NAHL team. Seriously.

by Paperwork Ninja on Nov 2, 2011 2:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Offense isn't the problem.

Goals For: 28, t-6th in the West
Goals Against: 31, t-11th in the West

Offense isn’t great, but defense is clearly the bigger problem.

5-on-5 GF: 21, t-4th in the West
5-on-5 GA: 18, 8th in the West

At even strength, the Blues are doing pretty well. Both ends of the ice are playing at a playoff-caliber level.

PP%: 8.3%, 15th in the West
PK%: 72.2%, 14th in the West

Here’s the problem. The Blues have given up 10 power-play goals, despite being shorthanded only 36 times (t-1st in the West). They’ve only given up 53 Shots Against while shorthanded. Payne can shuffle the lineups from now until April; but if he can’t find a couple of four-man units who can start killing penalties with regularity, the team as a whole is going nowhere.

by BleedBlue42 on Nov 2, 2011 5:41 PM CDT reply actions  

If youre

Going to have the righty, righty d pair put your offensive d on the left for the one timer, polak would be no good there

going through the handshake line at my game the other night, guy says youre still a prick Evan...me: yep sure am next time stop me from scoring

by DESTROYER on Nov 2, 2011 7:06 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

close...

Grachev-Backes-D’Agostini
Oshie-Berglund-Stewart
Steen-Arnott-Langenbrunner
Sobotka-Nichol-Porter

No way you can complain about these. Obviously they will be shuffled more when perry and A-Mac return, but you will dent the twine with this setup for sure.

D pairings Idc, as long as Chorney gets a shot (the next 28584828437 games someone is injured).

by WhoLeTheDagsOut on Nov 2, 2011 8:16 PM CDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Ya see though...

WhoLeTheDagsOut actually needs to change his moniker to OscarTheGrachev… or something.

PC Load Letter? What the fuck does that mean?

by DanGNR on Nov 3, 2011 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've always tried to avoid complaining about lines.

I figure the coach knows better than I do so i shouldn’t complain about line combos, but the last few games I’ve grown extremely frustrated. I can understand shuffling the lines every couple games if a line or two need tweaking or when there’s an injury, but this rolling out different lines every couple of shifts shit needs to go. I realize these guys have to have chemistry or their line isn’t going to produce, but a few minutes is simply not enough to be able to tell if they are going to work out. Hell I think you need to give it at least a game or two if not longer before tweaking a line. I just want to see a little consistency. I can’t remember any time since the lockout where I’ve watched a game and known for sure which was the definitive number 1 line and that is infuriating as a fan.

"At least we aren't Cleveland." - every team that's ever sucked that wasn't from Cleveland.

by blunatic on Nov 2, 2011 10:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Why not the St. Louis Blues.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Mellanby Gone
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
HELP NEEDED
Brian Elliott joins You Can Play Project :)
Monday Night Miracle. 26 years ago today (May 12, 1986)
Monday Open Thread
This was how I was during game 3 of this past series. I was more composed by game 4.
Ryan Reaves to be included in Game 4
I was interviewed for school and here is the finished product... I am a DORK!
The Donut Corner - Giving Up Is For Losers

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who's the better tandem: Plante/Hall or Halak/Elliott?
Plante/Hall
61 votes
Halak/Elliott
95 votes
They're both awesome.
113 votes
How do you even compare these two?
114 votes

383 votes | Poll has closed


Bobby

Face_lo-res_copy_small gallagher

160gthockey_small Brad Lee

250px-nation_of_joe_small averagejoe

Barclay

Fulton_display_image_small Poor College Student

19659_686325605993_17221278_39458432_4223533_n_small bradflick55

Portman_small hartigan

Billy

Nickmason12_small Tomorrows Blues

Img_0645_small Donut King

Stag_logo_small CrossCheckRaise

549122314_small hildymac

Nate_the_great_small NateTheGreat.

Picbylindsey1_small RealBadRobot

Small socityhooligan

Keith3_small Andy Portico