Blues win ugly over Dallas, get the two points.
It's a shame that this had to be a nationally televised game, because it was one of the Blues' sloppiest and most boring outings in a long, long time. That won't matter to all the mouth-breathers out thger who are, no doubt, already tapping into their keyboards about how the boring Blues are killing the NHL by employing Ken Hitchcock's 1999 trap system.
They aren't and he isn't, but good luck getting anyone to believe that if they have a sample size of one in Blues games watched. Lots of chipping and chasing, lots of tied up pucks along the boards, lots of scrums at the net - that was some ugly, ugly hockey.
But the Blues proved they can win ugly, grinding games too. They've won shootouts (both literal and figurative) and they've won fast-paced games full of big hits. They now also know they can win these games down in the trenches, too.
The Blues now hold a share of the NHL lead in points and hold the top spot in the West. That's exciting, yes, but it's also likely to be fleeting as Detroit plays tomorrow and Chicago plays Wednesday, so by the time they take the ice again, the Note could be back in third in the Division and fifth in the West. I'd recommend enjoying the look of the standings, but let's try to stay somewhat even keel on this. The Blues are in a great spot and are doing a great job of getting points every game, but this is going to be a slugfest and they'd better be ready for the battle for position to go on all year.
Instead of bulletpoints tonight, I'm just going to turn it over to you all to spell it out in the comments. Who was good, who looked slow, is Oshie finding another gear and finally, is any penalty called more inconsistently in the NHL than interference?
Do your thing, yo.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well...
Doing good:
Perron as playmaker. He might not be getting goals, but he’s getting assists.
Backes as captain. He’s leading from the front, taking shots, making plays, and hitting opponents hard.
T.J. Oshie as driver. He gets the puck into the opponents’ zone and pressures the goalie. Then he scores.
Ryan Reaves. “My name is Ryan Reaves and I get respect. My cash and your blood is what I expect.”
Jason Arnott as Grumpy Old Man. “Kids these days don’t know how good they have it… in my day we’d score like THIS!” (Arnott scores, horn goes off)
Barret Jackman as Defensive Linchpin. He’s playing the roles of himself, Russell and Huskins right now. He’d be justified in saying “SIR JAXX SAYS HOLD MY DIIIIIICK”
Doing better than before:
Chris Stewart. Is he going along to get along or is he listening to his teammates and buying into the team?
Jamie Langenbrunner. He’s competing with his fellow Grumpy Old Man Jason Arnott and he’s getting the puck into the zone for the shooters.
Jaroslav Halak. Apparently he only lets “bad Jaro” out during October and November. When he gets a competent backup to compete for the number one spot, he goes into “good Jaro” mode.
Sliding down the chart:
Ian Cole. Dude, I love you, but stop giving up the puck in your own zone. That’s three times in three games I’ve seen it happen.
In the basement and/or the doghouse:
Patrik Berglund. What the hell, man? Did you get lazy or something? Scott Nichol would make a better second-liner than you. Dude needs to pull his head out of his backside. He’s not making many hits and is slowly turning into trade material.
Let's Go Blues!
Support your local NAHL team. Seriously.
by Paperwork Ninja on Jan 16, 2012 10:03 PM CST reply actions
Bergs is in theEJ zone right now
He’s an own goal away from being shipped away, but I’ll leave that up to DA…he is the master of this puppet game
St Louis Blues - Season Ticket Holder - Sec 106
SUTA
Twitter: @jdandturkelton
What Exactly is a God Wand?
Anyone who says "Nuff said" or "Need I say more?" needs to be elbowed in the cock.
by I_AM_SPARTACUS on Jan 16, 2012 10:18 PM CST up reply actions
hard fought win
nhl acticle says we won 2-1 tonight guys. i’m suprised the nhl admitted a western conference game occured outside of detroit or chicago
Concerning Berglund
Has anyone else noticed that over the past few games he has held the puck when he should have passed? And not only that, but it’s when his teammates are calling for the pass? He just puck hogs, then loses the puck on either the half boards, or behind the net. What the hell is up with that guy right now?
Before we bitched about him not shooting enough
So hes trying to change things up. He sucked the first half of last year then we crazy the second half. Probably winding up to do the same again this year.
He raged at the world, at his family, at his life. But mostly he just raged.
Aren't you that guy who hates the blues?
It was a bit sloppy
But I thought it was a really entertaining game. Then again I enjoy defense so it was fun to see a hard hitting grinding game. I don’t think it was boring, just that Dallas had a goalie that seems to have the Blues number.
Reffing continues to suck in the NHL
Also, I’m indeed sick of hearing about this Crosby concussion thing. I DON’T CARE. Sure he’s the golden boy, but I don’t need to hear about every time he takes a leak. I almost hope he retires so we can quit getting this shoved down our throats.
Great Blues win though.
Barret Jackman is my hero.
In remembrance of Pavol Demitra and all our fallen Blues brethren.
Thoughts:
Via gallagher: “It’s a shame that this had to be a nationally televised game, because it was one of the Blues’ sloppiest and most boring outings in a long, long time.”
I disagree. It was a heavily-contested matchup on each side. To Random Viewer, it may have seemed sloppy or boring, but this kind of play is hard to do well in the NHL — and both teams played it hard and consistent. You did correct this later in your rundown, little g, saying it’s a show of resolve/character for our Blues.
This was a secondary line game, only because the first lines were so regularly hemmed in and on the boards. And our secondary lines (which includes two through four) performed admirably. A game like tonight’s relies on the big error and the Blues, top to bottom, did a great job at avoiding it (breakaway on Halak aside).
Tonight’s was a game that could have been a letdown, but the Blues squad saw a tenacious opponent and played steadily and smartly until (and after) the eventual game winner was potted.
Great effort. Not pretty. Not highlit reel stuff. But a show of a determined team who can play well in all scenarios.
I once shot a man just to see him die...then I got distracted and missed it.
by TheDuke32 on Jan 16, 2012 10:35 PM CST via mobile reply actions
...but those 2 points don't look sloppy in the standings.
Yes, it was a slugfest, but we got 2 when we needed to get 2. Not much to complain about on that area.
Oshie seems to be coming in to his own, Stewart is looking better, and damn it’s good to have Perron back.
Also, I’d like to call out NBC. I get that it was a one-sided domination, but please tell Mike Keenan to sit down, as his Detroit-boner is showing.
A blast from the past...
For those mouth breathers, take a good look at what Dallas was doing. THAT was the 1-3-1 neutral zone trap, left wing/right wing lock, a la New Jersey Devils and Jacques Lemaire. It was a turn back the clock moment as pursuing forwards were routinely grabbed and hooked through the zone without any call, slowing them down and keeping the attacking forecheck to a minimum by allowing the defense to get to the puck first and chip it out. One of the ideas behind the “new” NHL interference rule was to reduce the effectiveness of the trap by allowing the attacking team skaters to have speed through the neutral zone so they would have a better chance of gaining possession in the offensive zone. When it doesn’t get called, and you add to that the Nashville gambit (two players in front of the net whenever the puck goes to the slot in the offensive zone, you wind up with games like tonight. The Blues still had 30+ shots nonetheless.
Did you notice that coach matched up Ryan Reaves with Steve Ott for the first period, regardless of the rest of the line? Is it a coincidence that Ott was very quiet throughout the game? Just sayin’.
Oshie on getting hacked, grabbed, tripped, and jobbed by the refs all night: “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can will ever imagine.” He was a man on a mission tonight.
Berglund: He’s still only 23, and the strongest player with the puck on the boards on the team, except maybe for Alex Steen (who is sorely missed in games like this.) If he sucks as bad as people are saying, he’s not worth anything the Blues need in a trade. If he’s worth something, you think Army wouldn’t pull the trigger if the right deal came along? If the coaching staff thinks he isn’t a valuable piece of the team, would he be getting second-line minutes and PP and PK time since the team is so deep at center? If he doesn’t turn into anything more than a third-line center in another three years, then we can move on. But since he’s not showing up on the scoresheet as much as we think he should, that also means he’s going to be inexpensive during his RFA years.
Perron: when he gets the puck flat on his stick in the offensive zone, somebody on the opposing team is going to end up looking stupid. If he gets a quicker release, he’ll be a perennial all-star and a marquee player. I also like that he’s got PK duties and doesn’t look lost out there.
General observation not specific to this game: the forwards need to get the puck away quicker and on net.
Refereeing: So what else is new? This was called like a pre-strike playoff game. Victory went to the team with the strongest will.
by The Goalie Guy on Jan 16, 2012 10:41 PM CST reply actions
Quote:
“Berglund: He’s still only 23, and the strongest player with the puck on the boards on the team…”
Disagree. Whether through strength or shiftiness, there are SEVERAL forwards (and a couple of defensemen) stronger along the boards. Sobe, Perron, Osh, hell even Langenbeunner, Arnott and Reaves can hold on, scrap, and come away with it more effectively.
I’m not ready to give up on Berglund, but he is not a sideboard battler. His best play (and best goals) comes from a quick push off the boards and into the center for a snapshot.
I once shot a man just to see him die...then I got distracted and missed it.
by TheDuke32 on Jan 16, 2012 10:53 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Okay, maybe not Osh.
But I’ll cancel him out and add in Backes to replace him.
I once shot a man just to see him die...then I got distracted and missed it.
by TheDuke32 on Jan 16, 2012 11:02 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
We'll just have to disagree on that.
I haven’t seen him get physically knocked off the puck along the boards very often this year – defensemen have at best stopped cold, and it’s usually taken a double team to take the puck from him. He’s been much stronger on the boards this year. Do I have issues with his play? Sure. He’s still too slow at making the pass/shot decision, and he doesn’t make the “right” one (disclaimer-the game is a lot harder on the ice than in the stands) much of the time. But his ability to gain and keep the puck on the boards isn’t one of them.
by The Goalie Guy on Jan 17, 2012 6:02 PM CST up reply actions
And all of this in 2012 minus...
Steen and Mac for the most part.
Stewart was invisible again tonight in my eyes. Imagine if everyone played as hard as TJ tonight. Well let me correct myself, some actually did, but others clearly didn’t seem too….Chris I’m looking at you.
"It's not so much me as it is Roenick. He's good." - Trent
"I took the Kings to the Cup" - Sue.
"Yea that was against the computer with the offsides turned off" - Trent
what happened to sobotka?
Sobotka was playing like the little engine that could for the first half of the season. He even had my vote for ‘buy a new jersey with his name on it’ at Xmastime.
However, I’ve seen noticeably less impact from Vladi lately. Anyone have perspective? Is it due to less ice time, different line partners, or just less stellar play? Is it correlated to Perron’s return?
He’s certainly not squandering opportunities and attracting everyone’s ire like Berglund, but I’ve just noticed less contribution from him on the ice. You all must too, since his name is conspicuously absent from the posts these days.
I think it's other guys taking the limelight.
Sobe still scraps for the puck and moves it to the opponents’ zone. He just doesn’t shoot as much since he’s usually paired with Arnott and D’Ags.
Let's Go Blues!
Support your local NAHL team. Seriously.
by Paperwork Ninja on Jan 17, 2012 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
He described his role during an intermission interview
A week or two ago as “to help out the defenseman.” Which as a center I think that’s translating into more conservative play, making sure he doesn’t get caught up ice.
Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not. - Thomas Jefferson

by 






















