Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Blues beat who they're supposed to beat: get two points off Ottawa

The Blues continue to be a good team in the NHL. They are beating the teams they are supposed to beat, like a struggling Ottawa Senators team that was just bag-skated by the coaching staff, and they have a good record against the better teams in the league too. At home they are unbelievably 22-3-4. They are now 9-11-3 on the road, with three of the losses and two of the OT losses at the hands of Detroit and Nashville. Against the East they are now 10-0-2. They have beaten the class of the NHL with wins against San Jose, Vancouver, Detroit, the Rangers and Washington, all division leaders. They have beaten teams like Chicago and Pittsburgh.

The Blues are second in the division, tied in points but with two games in hand against Nashville and three points behind, but with two games in hand against Detroit. They've done it playing coach Ken Hitchcock's "200 foot game" and doing their best to play "all 60 minutes" as they are fond of saying in interviews. The commitment is there. The tenacity is there.

You could say that the fans are getting pretty cocky when we say there are teams we expect to beat now. That there are teams the Blues should definitely get both points from whenever they meet. It's only cocky if you can't back it up, as they say. And the Blues have made it possible for us to talk this way. The last time the Blues lost to a team that wasn't Detroit, Nashville, Vancouver or Pittsburgh (all top-10 teams in the NHL) was December 21st when they lost to Colorado.

So, we expect the Blues to beat a team like Ottawa which had lost it's previous six games. The Senators had scored three goals in a game only once in the last three weeks. They're spiraling out of the playoffs. The Blues, like big cats in the wild, pick off teams like the Senators for an afternoon snack.

But there are problems. The Blues do not consistently score enough, despite averaging over 31 shots per game, eighth best in the league. They have lulls in nearly every game where they end up chasing and giving up extended offensive opportunities to the opponent. They can be knocked off their game and tricked into taking dumb penalties at dumb times.

These are all issues that must be addressed. Some are just part of adjusting to the new culture: dumb penalties can be weeded out. Avoiding letdowns are a team effort and require extra effort when they start in order to end them quickly. Some issues may need an adjustment: a large quantity of shots means jack and squat if you don't have any quality shots. As we wrote about on Monday, the answer doesn't look like another goal scorer, it looks like adding another playmaker. But is that guy Andy McDonald or is he someone to be acquired by trade?

A bigger problem is beating teams within the division. The Blues are 16-8-3 against the Pacific and Northwest Divisions combined. Against the Central they are 5-6-2. With the way the top eight seeds are shaping up, it looks like four Central teams could be in that mix. If the Blues expect to go anywhere exciting in the playoffs, they're going to have to knock off one or two other Central teams to do it. They have to withstand the lightning strikes off offense from Chicago. They have to crack through Nashville's defense and Pekka Rinne. They have to get over the mental block they have about the Red Menace at the Joe Louis.

Confidence comes from playing well. The Blues are playing well. With a couple tweaks and a couple big wins against those other three Central teams and we might really have something here.

Until then, they just need to keep getting two points from the teams they are supposed to get two points from. Like New Jersey on Thursday.

Let's go Blues.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Blues may have racked up points in January

but really, I don’t think they’ve played well since before Christmas. They’ve been riding great goal-tending, doing just enough to beat lesser teams, many riddled with injuries. The Blues will probably still make the playoffs, but they won’t go far unless they get back to how they were playing in November/December.

by PersonalJustice on Feb 7, 2012 11:38 PM CST reply actions  

Uhhh

We have been just as injury riddled as other teams, if not more.

Also, We were 15-6-5 in Nov/Dec. Seven of those wins were by two or more goals. We scored 3 or more goals in 11 games. There were 4 shutouts pitched for us in that span.

In Jan/Feb we are 10-2-2. Five of those wins were by two or more goals. We scored 3 or more goals in 7 of those games. There were 5 shutouts in that span.

That is a pretty similar effort between the two months if the edge doesn’t go to Jan/Feb play. But your opinion is your opinion. I just wanted to provide some numbers for a little context. I agree we could play better but I don’t think we are playing any worse than right after Hitch took over, especially with injuries we have had to overcome in this time as opposed to the first half.

by TheFlyingCavallinis on Feb 8, 2012 12:21 AM CST reply actions  

Agree

I think the big difference in perception is for those 2 months, us being so great was almost a new experience, and we as a group were excited as hell. Now, us being great is just something we’ve accepted, and we are poking holes trying to be even better.

Admitted, today was not our best performance, but in years past if we gave a mediocre performance, we don’t win by 2.

Is willing to go to the mattresses with the lot of yous.

by Novacain on Feb 8, 2012 2:23 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Okay Story

I think what really was missing in it was bullet points though.

by Holiday86 on Feb 8, 2012 12:26 AM CST reply actions  

haha

I’m just giving you a hard time. Great read as always.

by Holiday86 on Feb 8, 2012 12:51 AM CST up reply actions  

And also as far as playing the Central Divisions teams...

We have the following schedule remaining:

1 home game against Detroit
1 home/1 road against Nashville
1 home/3 road against Chicago
2 home/2 away against Columbus

So we have only 3 games remaining against the top two other teams in the division and two of those are at home. We have 8 against the two (as of right now) weaker teams in the division, while 3 are at home. I would say we have the easier division schedule remaining by far than that which we have played.

by TheFlyingCavallinis on Feb 8, 2012 12:37 AM CST reply actions  

I got no problem with it.

The Blues kryptonite is teams who have elite goalies, for the most part. I think there are worse things in the world then the prospect of the Blues and Hawks getting the 4-5 matchup if we don’t win the division.

Funny thing is, the only team I want nothing to do with come playoff time is Nashville. Rinne terrifies me. And my gut says that’s what ends up happening, and Chicago draws San Jose as the 6.

Is willing to go to the mattresses with the lot of yous.

by Novacain on Feb 8, 2012 2:15 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

As for our Central foes...

Nashville plays 3 games against Det, 3 Chi, 2 STL while they split those four home and four road. Note they have already played 6 games against Columbus. This sort of skews their current central division record.

Chicago has 2 against Col, 3 against Det, 4 STL, 3 Nash while they split those 5 home and 7 road.

Detroit has 3 Nash, 1 STL, 3 Col, 3 Chi while they split those 5/5.

So as far as our division games go, I think Chicago has the toughest road, Nashville second, and a tie between us and Detroit for easiest schedule. Again this is based on how teams have played and are playing recently in my opinion.

by TheFlyingCavallinis on Feb 8, 2012 5:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Im calling it

Look out for Perron. He looked dangerous in the last game against Nashville too. Watch for this kid to take on a much bigger role as this season “rolls” along (no pun intended)

by muffin stuffin on Feb 8, 2012 1:30 AM CST reply actions  

Also, since the trade deadline is coming up

Who would you trade for whom? people keep talking about setwart of berglund, but im not so sure Dags is off the chopping block. Dude has NOT been contributing. And Bishop is out too. we can’t trade him unless Allen gets his head out of his ass. Who would you trade?

by muffin stuffin on Feb 8, 2012 1:39 AM CST reply actions  

I've thought it over...

And I’d be okay with dealing Dagger and Cola today, if there was a suitable trade to be made. I just don’t think there is. Stastny, St. Louis, Getzlaf, and Roy are all solid guys to aim for (as had been said here already), but the price required is in question.

Now, if anybody is willing to take Dagger, Cola, Bishop (yeah, it hurts Peoria, but sometimes you gotta take that leap) and maybe a pick for any of those first 3, I jump. Roy… I’d want to buy a bit lower on.

Is willing to go to the mattresses with the lot of yous.

by Novacain on Feb 8, 2012 2:19 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I still don't think anyone would take that trade...

A question mark Goalie (he hasn’t proven that he can be consistent yet), an injury prone D-Man, a 3rd Line FW and a pick…

Quantity does not equal quality. The only way someone makes that deal is if the pick is a first rounder and they are trying to dump salary.

Tarasenko, or Jaden would have to be involved in any of those guys, and I don’t see the Blues making that trade, as they shouldn’t. Yes Bergie has been a disappointment, but he is worth more to us, than to anyone else, as is Stewart at the moment.

Sell high. Problem is, we don’t have anyone high enough. We have ‘prospects’, but none in which we are willing to part with. At least I hope not.

Its weird... half the year my blood is red... but then the other half... it's blue... hm...

by PeacockJac on Feb 8, 2012 3:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Not saying anyone would take it...

Saying it’s what I’d offer. I don’t think we are nearly as desperate as most major media types seem to think we are. Boston won the Stanley Cup last year with talented depth and great goaltending. We got em both. I only take a trade if it’s nice and wrapped up with a pretty bow.

Is willing to go to the mattresses with the lot of yous.

by Novacain on Feb 8, 2012 8:18 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I thought for sure

DP57 was going to get a hatty.

Just a chew toy for the hockey gods

by spectr17 on Feb 8, 2012 3:44 AM CST reply actions  

I have to say

Watching last night I really was afraid we were going to lose that one. It seemed like an incredibly sloppy game. It sure wasn’t the domination based 200 foot game we’ve come to expect.

We got the points yes, but we can play SO much better than that.

Barret Jackman is my hero.

In remembrance of Pavol Demitra and all our fallen Blues brethren.

by BluesTiger on Feb 8, 2012 1:07 PM CST reply actions  

But like has been said up top and before...

we ARE winning games that we don’t play our best. We don’t have to play at damn near 100% to beat even middling teams anymore. While some of that is the incredible netminding, a lot of it is also a better overall skill level and “compete” level… even though I HATE that term.

by TheFlyingCavallinis on Feb 8, 2012 6:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Why not the St. Louis Blues.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Mellanby Gone
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
HELP NEEDED
Brian Elliott joins You Can Play Project :)
Monday Night Miracle. 26 years ago today (May 12, 1986)
Monday Open Thread
This was how I was during game 3 of this past series. I was more composed by game 4.
Ryan Reaves to be included in Game 4
I was interviewed for school and here is the finished product... I am a DORK!
The Donut Corner - Giving Up Is For Losers

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Featured Poll

Poll
Who's the better tandem: Plante/Hall or Halak/Elliott?
Plante/Hall
61 votes
Halak/Elliott
95 votes
They're both awesome.
113 votes
How do you even compare these two?
114 votes

383 votes | Poll has closed


Bobby

Face_lo-res_copy_small gallagher

160gthockey_small Brad Lee

250px-nation_of_joe_small averagejoe

Barclay

Fulton_display_image_small Poor College Student

19659_686325605993_17221278_39458432_4223533_n_small bradflick55

Portman_small hartigan

Billy

Nickmason12_small Tomorrows Blues

Img_0645_small Donut King

Stag_logo_small CrossCheckRaise

549122314_small hildymac

Nate_the_great_small NateTheGreat.

Picbylindsey1_small RealBadRobot

Small socityhooligan

Keith3_small Andy Portico